He didn't say shit today, you began,
And if you weren't obsessed, you wouldn't care and wouldn't feel the need to fight the unjustice pep is facing

Holy shit you are delusional if you believe this. This is why I ignore you

imaginary faults
so clueless

get yourself some boots and play the game, maybe that can help

great game today and the first game rekt us after all

Look at the comments before the game. Look at his implication of Pep (again^^) losing this semi-final during the first leg...

Also, this has nothing to do with injustice. It has to do with lots of so called Bayern supporters not being able to even comprehend what is going on the field, yet trying to find the easiest target to make a scapegoat^^ this time it's Pep, next time it'll be Ancelotti... they all have their heads high in the sky just because Heynckes was lucky enough to snatch the trophy based on van Gaal's groundwork

Leicester > literally whole of Europe

lol get away with your "gequirlte Stammtischscheisse", because that's all you ever come up with... Müller being out in the 1st leg and now basically deciding the game with his miss... seems about right to ignore game 2 and focus on the first leg then.

This post was edited by aneas on May 3 2016 03:07pm

bla bla bla

now this is an interesting theory, please elaborate. while i'm certainly not denying the positives of van gaal's stint at bayern (recognising, fostering and trusting important youth players) - why has heynckes just been "lucky"? and more importantly, why do you grant said luck (to have a team of good players and make them win the cl) only to heynckes and not to pep, who had the SAME good players PLUS tens of millions to spend and make it his team just like heynckes made them his team?

Don't get me wrong. I'm NOT saying Heynckes isn't a good coach or that winning the trophy was pure luck on his side.

BUT imagine another coach (not van Gaal) as his predecessor, leaving him with a different team with different tactical groundwork and (who knows) maybe without Müller or Badstuber already being part of the squad and experienced in international games.

Heynckes would have had to start all over then, wouldn't he? So one can say he was lucky he had van Gaal's groundwork to base his eventual formation and tactical demands on, right? Imagine van Gaal never being there and Henyckes taking over the squad formerly coached by Klinsmann... unlucky for ANY coach imo.

Also, winning CL is ALWAYS strongly connected to being lucky, don't you think? So many variables, so many factors that could be deciding... it's simply not plannable. 3x semis isn't a sign of failure for the club or the coach or the players imo. It's a sign of being constantly able to push limits.

This post was edited by aneas on May 3 2016 03:21pm

are there any atleti fans here?

if so gz and gl guys, your hard work should be rewarded in the final