d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > Sports Coliseum > World Football - Soccer > Champions League 2015/2016 Official Thread
Prev1128129130131132158Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 13,173
Joined: Nov 30 2006
Gold: 641.00
Apr 28 2016 01:46am
Quote (fender @ 27 Apr 2016 21:48)
i see what you're doing here and i think it's quite cute but no, bayern created many more chances and all atletico did in the 2nd half was crowding their own half and box and ONE single counter attack...
don't get me wrong, they are good at that but given how cheap the goal was bayern gave up in the 1st half it's clearly overall an unfortunate result...


There was not one 100% chance, only little ones that with the best of luck ever could have been a goal.
Member
Posts: 53,359
Joined: Jan 20 2009
Gold: 4,383.11
Apr 28 2016 02:01am
Quote (zarkadon @ 28 Apr 2016 02:23)
I'm assuming you mean 11/12, since in 12/13 you got raped in the group stages... now let's compare some stats:

Bayern only had 2 shots on target more than Atlético tonight, while Chelsea had 5 less than Barça in the 1st leg of semis, 2 less than Barça in the 2nd leg, and 4 less than Bayern in the final.
Bayern and Atlético had the same amount of cornerkicks tonight, while Chelsea had 7 less than Barça in the 1st leg of semis, 9 less than Barça in the 2nd leg, and 19 less than Bayern in the final.
Bayern commited 5 more fouls than Atlético tonight (dispite Atlético playing the defensive role and recovering far more balls), while Chelsea had 3 less than Barça in the 1st leg of semis, 2 more than Barça in the 2nd leg, and 12 more than Bayern in the final.

Can't argue with that. Atlético concedes less shots on target, less corner kicks and is able to recover the ball without fouling, making their defending much more efficient than Chelsea's during the 2011-12 CL season. Just look at how Bayern ended up making more fouls than them dispite having to recover the ball a lot less...


lewa was fouled on every scene and did not get single call
ref was an absolute wanker there

while having more fouls, we missed to make the important one in stopping saul <_<

aside from that its true, especially filipe luis was outstanding in ball recovery with precise tacklings

@ CpTJenJen
yep
Member
Posts: 13,173
Joined: Nov 30 2006
Gold: 641.00
Apr 28 2016 02:25am
Quote (ampoo @ 28 Apr 2016 09:01)
lewa was fouled on every scene and did not get single call
ref was an absolute wanker there

while having more fouls, we missed to make the important one in stopping saul <_<

aside from that its true, especially filipe luis was outstanding in ball recovery with precise tacklings

@ CpTJenJen
yep


True, allthough the fouls were marginal, sometimes he should have given them. The rest of the game he did well IMO. It was pretty much a fair game with the occasional foul at times.
Member
Posts: 53,359
Joined: Jan 20 2009
Gold: 4,383.11
Apr 28 2016 02:32am
Quote (CpTJenJen @ 28 Apr 2016 10:25)
True, allthough the fouls were marginal, sometimes he should have given them. The rest of the game he did well IMO. It was pretty much a fair game with the occasional foul at times.


agreed in general it was alright, i guess he dislikes polish people somehow :lol:

on the other hand lewa should have sent that gimenez guy flying to put up a fight somehow....
Member
Posts: 28,849
Joined: Mar 8 2010
Gold: 2,570.91
Apr 28 2016 03:28am
Quote (fender @ 28 Apr 2016 07:54)
while you sure make a lot of valid points here and i absolutely agree that atlético's style of defending has much more skill and tactic involved than chelsea's, i would not overrate the number of CALLED fouls and cards given from yesterday's match. that had much to do with a very inconsistant ref when it came to calls and individual punishment - and the usual acting performance you get when playing in madrid. and let's not forget the different nature of "fouls" that occur when teams with completely different playstyles (one possession and passing oriented, the other one pressing and counter attacking) are involved...


tbf I think the ref's performance last night was ok in the fouls department. At least, with Bayern fouling 5 more times, I wouldn't say that his performance was significant enough to impact on the fact that Atlético performed less fouls than Bayern.

Also, I realized I made a mistake where I said Chelsea made 3 fouls less than Barça in the first leg of semis; it's 3 fouls more. So, I think there's a notable difference there when Atlético is making 5 less and Chelsea is making 2, 3 and a whopping 12 more fouls than the opposition.

The idea was not so much to compare Atlético's fouls with Bayern's, but Atlético's with Chelsea, as they are the ones that have the similar playstyle.

Quote (chelsea11 @ 28 Apr 2016 04:31)
Yeah my bad... Obviously I mean 11/12, first time I've ever made that mistake. We will see if atletico will win it this year, but you can't say chelsea did worse than them, if anything they did better because they actually won it. All these stats you are showing doesn't mean shit. Look at the possession atletico was down, 80-20?none of these shots/corners/fouls mean anything.
Also this bayern team is pretty fking pathetic... And they played barca while messi/neymar are half asleep, and barca usually has bad def. so if messi/neymar isn't sleeping they are fked


It was 72-28 in both Barça-Chelsea games, and 71-29 in yesterday's game, so they had the same possesion. Chelsea only had greater possession than Atlético in the fina, when they had 44% against Bayern's 56%.

Now that actually makes things worse for Chelsea. With the same or more possesion than Atlético, they commit more fouls and concede more shots on targets and cornerkicks...

And, while I hope Atlético doesn't win the CL, ending up without the trophy won't make them worse than Chelsea if they keep defending like this. If Chelsea played just like in 2012 for 20 years and Atlético played like last night for 20 years, it's almost certain that Atlético would end up winning more CL's than Chelsea in that period.

This post was edited by zarkadon on Apr 28 2016 03:28am
Member
Posts: 13,173
Joined: Nov 30 2006
Gold: 641.00
Apr 28 2016 05:14am
Quote (ampoo @ 28 Apr 2016 09:32)
agreed in general it was alright, i guess he dislikes polish people somehow :lol:

on the other hand lewa should have sent that gimenez guy flying to put up a fight somehow....


He was expecting calls that usually aren't given by english refs. IMO that is a good thing, it's getting a bit girly as of late. "oh he touched me, lets lay down and get a free kick" where it used to be "he nearly shattered my ankle and broke my leg, maybe that is a foul, lets play on, ref will blow his whistle when it is a foul"
Member
Posts: 15,619
Joined: Aug 4 2010
Gold: Locked
Apr 28 2016 08:25am
Quote (zarkadon @ Apr 28 2016 05:28am)
tbf I think the ref's performance last night was ok in the fouls department. At least, with Bayern fouling 5 more times, I wouldn't say that his performance was significant enough to impact on the fact that Atlético performed less fouls than Bayern.

Also, I realized I made a mistake where I said Chelsea made 3 fouls less than Barça in the first leg of semis; it's 3 fouls more. So, I think there's a notable difference there when Atlético is making 5 less and Chelsea is making 2, 3 and a whopping 12 more fouls than the opposition.

The idea was not so much to compare Atlético's fouls with Bayern's, but Atlético's with Chelsea, as they are the ones that have the similar playstyle.



It was 72-28 in both Barça-Chelsea games, and 71-29 in yesterday's game, so they had the same possesion. Chelsea only had greater possession than Atlético in the fina, when they had 44% against Bayern's 56%.

Now that actually makes things worse for Chelsea. With the same or more possesion than Atlético, they commit more fouls and concede more shots on targets and cornerkicks...

And, while I hope Atlético doesn't win the CL, ending up without the trophy won't make them worse than Chelsea if they keep defending like this. If Chelsea played just like in 2012 for 20 years and Atletico played like last night for 20 years, it's almost certain that Atlético would end up winning more CL's than Chelsea in that period.


I see lots of ifs, would, hope... Come on now zark..
It's funny look at the 3 years around 2008 when chelsea should have won the CL twice and they didn't win it at all. We weren't even going full out defense, and we had a lot of chances as well as dominating opponents.
Member
Posts: 16,144
Joined: Aug 17 2008
Gold: 175.00
Apr 28 2016 09:00am
Quote (chelsea11 @ Apr 28 2016 02:25pm)
I see lots of ifs, would, hope... Come on now zark..
It's funny look at the 3 years around 2008 when chelsea should have won the CL twice and they didn't win it at all. We weren't even going full out defense, and we had a lot of chances as well as dominating opponents.


Definitely.

Luck/refereeing decisions are big factors in the champions league
Member
Posts: 53,359
Joined: Jan 20 2009
Gold: 4,383.11
Apr 28 2016 09:33am
Quote (aswethegods @ 28 Apr 2016 17:00)
Definitely.

Luck/refereeing decisions are big factors in the champions league


that chelsea barca game back then was the biggest disgrace in cl history....
Member
Posts: 16,144
Joined: Aug 17 2008
Gold: 175.00
Apr 28 2016 10:15am
Quote (ampoo @ Apr 28 2016 03:33pm)
that chelsea barca game back then was the biggest disgrace in cl history....


Ill never forget that game it was crazy lol... one of many in a 3 year period when referees were just loving barcelona

Im sure the ref from that game hasnt worked again since haha hes probably sitting on a big pile of bribe money in hiding somewhere
Go Back To World Football - Soccer Topic List
Prev1128129130131132158Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll