Quote (ampoo @ 2 Sep 2016 01:47)
of course not, but as already pointed out, these mills grind slowly
they always have
both parties are getting their shit together atm so give it a rest already, you almost sound like these "mimimi just quit already" butthurt guys in the eu parliament
i personally would have done something already, on that i agree, but i am not a diplomat :p
i think you missed the point. as i stated before, it's perfectly understandable that after cameron ragequit it was basically impossible to trigger article 50 immediately.
give them a reasonable amount of time to find a new leadership? of course! they had that and did that.
if they had said at that point " listen guys, we still need time to sort things out, give us until february 2017, we'll trigger art. 50 then" that might not have been the best case scenario but still acceptable imo.
what's completely unacceptable and potentially hurting ALL economies completely unnecessarily is the fact that they don't commit at all, they are stalling and wasting precious time. reminds me of the greece negotiations to be honest...
but yeah, that also was not at all what you posted before where you claimed it was a matter of opinion if they set a date or not, i liked this post (apart from the unnecessary butthurt diplomat part) better...