Ah yes, forgot about that.

Was about to say this....

But the U.S. should of hosted alone. Mexico already hosted twice and Canada is well.... Canada. This was stupid by the U.S. to even think of a Tri-host. They could of won it alone. They were just tired of losing the hosting rights for the last 12 years.

After not going to Russia this time, I’m definitely going to this one. I’ll be 32 then, holy shit

35 for me and my son will be 8, that's crazy to me

Congrats on the baby! (if it's already here)

I'll be 31.

Thanks!

September 25th!

This post was edited by Edgard on Jun 13 2018 08:18am

it basically is in the US alone

10 matches in mexico

10 matches in canada

60 in the US, including all matches from the quarters on

This post was edited by stuartg85 on Jun 13 2018 08:22am

Oh wow. Didnt know that. Not bad then. Mexico and Canada got jipped 😂😂😂

not locked in stone or anything, but that's the plan right now

"The 2026 tournament will feature an expanded field of 48 teams -- the current field has 32 -- and will mark the first time in FIFA's history that a three-nation bid has been awarded the showpiece event.

The joint bid's plans call for 60 of the 80 games to be played in the United States -- including all matches from the quarterfinals onward -- while Canada and Mexico host 10 apiece. The final is expected to be played at MetLife Stadium, just outside New York."

man, that kinda sucks for mexico. not only do they have the strongest team in their association, they also have the most passionate fans amongst the three hosts i'd imagine.

i mean, financially and infrastructure wise it kinda makes sense obviously, but as a football romantic i would have liked to see mexico hav a bigger share tbh...