True, sad that Adriano didnt stay professional as i believe he would be even better than him and that says a lot.

Zidane GOAT tho

this, but personally I think he was better at Inter

and I still think Messi #1 of all time, but Ronaldo is the #1 pure striker

This post was edited by dro94 on Dec 14 2015 11:23am

Messi #1 with no World Cup trophies? Dude...

Ronaldo zidane maradona pele

the others are below these 4

You don't need to be a world cup winner to be the best player of all time. At least in my opinion you don't.

Why define a 10+ years professional career in 1 tournament? It just doesn't make sense to me.

and for the record I doubt Ronaldo could have won the world cup for Argentina if he was there instead of Messi

Hm...I beg to differ, they way the win games is different. I think Ronaldo led Argentina wouldve beaten Germany, but obviously that's all if/buts.

This post was edited by Edgard on Dec 14 2015 11:47am

World cup is to determine which country is the best in the world, not who the best player in the world is.

Look at Germany, they are the best country in the world but do not posses the best player in the world.

my boy müller



i agree to some point
without taking anything away from messi, without the world cup he will never be the legend that maradona is

CARLOS Puyol LEL

Yes it should. As the most prestigious tournament in the world, the best player of all time should have this trophy in their shelf. Like was said before, Maradonna carried Argentina to Mexico '86 World Cup. Not only that, he went to a 2nd division team in Italy and took that team to their first Scudetto. Messi will never be respected in the sense that he never went to look for competition outside of Spain where the trophy was gifted to either Real Madrid or Barcelona. Not too much of a competition right? For one to think that Messi should be considered the best of all time is asinine. He stay's comfortable in a top team with a almost 50% chance to always win most of the major trophies. Dro pls.