Quote (jadeoshbogosh @ Jul 14 2016 03:46pm)
It's pretty insensible for the Supreme Court to waste their time with BS like this. I don't think she's petty enough to deny someone solely based on who they support for the Presidential nod. Just sounds like people are trying to make excuses in advance to the denial. No reason to try and justify it, it's a stupid fucking matter, it should have been resolved a year ago when Brady won his appeal. Fuck it though, time to take the 4 games and move on, I'm so tired of hearing about this shit.
don't get me wrong, I agree (with bolded) 100%.
but I questioned myself when someone like Mike Florio brought it up... and he wasn't the first person I heard mention it
also it's extremely uncommon for a supreme court judge to call someone out aka address the AP like she (RBG) did
Like i've said before, it;s not the end of the world for the team if Brady misses 4 games, especially with all the top tier pass rushers he's going up within the first 4 weeks lol. It's the draft picks that's going to hurt more down the road for the organization. Also I feel sorry for Brady that this will permanently harm his career (missing games/stats/potential to break more career records/etc), just a shitty situation for him...