People get very bitchy about taking trusteds off for inactivity. Don't remember what the system we decided on for that was.

we never voted on it to my knowledge.

I didn't complain about it

Retired trusted was definitely voted on.

Guards for Active

10/27/2012 7:50:35 PM Received 200.00 (7,900.00 -> 8,100.00) from Guards (202.00 -> 2.00) msu +24
11/11/2012 11:46:13 AM Sent -100.00 (11,520.00 -> 11,420.00) to Guards (890.00 -> 990.00) saints won
11/17/2012 6:23:54 PM Sent -100.00 (11,370.00 -> 11,270.00) to Guards (1,000.00 -> 1,100.00) Stanford gonna cover or win

Retired trusted if you don't post/bet on the website anymore there isn't really a point in creating that type of status

It would merely be an ego boost for older users who just want to maintain a reputation without being involved in the community.
It would be fun to have a list made up, but there is no real need for the bettor status. That may be something the trusted community should discuss - would also be like a cool history



I could understand this if they bet sparingly, but if you don't log on for nearly half a year ... it shouldn't even be a concern unless you've notified the community you'll be gone for a certain period of time.
GSY said he's leaving, and "might" come back so I don't see him complaining lol

This post was edited by Crispers on Jun 26 2013 11:06am

Crispy for trusted

retired was voted down and removal for inactivity is totally different imo.

Taking nominations for this months vote for 2 more days. I'll update the list after we vote. giving a week for voting this time instead of 3 days because its the 4th of July coming up and people might be afk.

Unknown?