Quote (jadeoshbogosh @ Jan 9 2018 12:44pm)
Wait, what? Do people here actually think it was better for us as a team moving him to SF, because we didn't want to play him? Ya... that's retarded, and no possible way is that fucking true. I could believe that since they liked Jimmy so much, they took less to get him to a team they thought might have a chance at success, but there's no way they didn't want him in Cleveland, because they didn't want to play him, that's idiotic.
I think it could be true that they were trying to hook jimmy up, although that’s super uncharacteristic of New England because they’re a very shrewd organization
I think it was passive aggression by B.B., but to answer your original question, the quote I was referring to insinuated that he was traded to SF so he couldn’t walk in Cleveland and sign with buffalo/New York/ dolphins.
I cringed super hard reading it. That dude should go work for a slander Magazine, or bleacher report