kid prolly dont even know what twack means lmao.

I'll twack you kid

Depth = The players behind the starters

The issue is the starters and the starters are not good, therefore it is the Depth that is also bad.
Both are bad right now, real bad.

haha. i found it a little odd that depth was being argued when there has been many moments when the starters have looked pedestrian at best

I know how you feel about ILB in a 3-4, I just don't see that depth should even be discussed when the starters suck. Having depth on the roster just isn't something I think is worrisome when there's no quality starters (as much as it pains me to say that due to my feelings towards Hawk).

hawk is officially leading the league in helmets lost. easily trouncing his next closest competitor by an average of 1.7 helmets lost per game. He's on his way to an ESPY imo

Tackles (I know, but still)
Burnett - 48
Hawk - 45
Multiple - 28

If nothing else, he's at least getting to the ball.

That's what I was saying if you misunderstood me, I was just saying we have shitty starters so why would we have any depth to back it up.

Shitty Starters means we obviously don't have anybody better behind them (therefore we have no depth)

But yeah if we have ILB worth a shit, our defense immensely gets better, but what can you do, you know how I feel about the 3-4 ILB's haha.

I know what you meant, just don't see the point in concern with that. I'd worry about OLine depth - somewhere I'm confident about the starters in training camp but worried if a couple guys go down. There's never a time when I'm worried about starting ILBs getting hurt, because how much worse can it be?

Lol yeah, exactly but let's not find out because it could get worse, don't challenge rock bottom.

That's pretty much what I was saying, it doesn't matter about the depth because our starters blow.

O-Line is something we can be strong at when we have all 5 starters but if one goes down, it instantly gets worse and by a long shot as we noticed in Seattle