Quote (Noun @ Jan 10 2021 09:41am)
It’s not even the no retract clause. It’s him butchering the lines then adding the no retract clause. He claims he doesn’t know how to read lines. That’s possible (I highly doubt it) for mistaking opening lines and current lines. But tell me how saints -5 came to be? Add it all up and it just points to him being a shady ass dude
I'm not claiming I don't know how to read lines. I just looked up the wrong games. As I said -1.5 was from December 27th. The NO-5 I got no idea where that was from I was on hour 14 of 16 trying to stay awake at work.
I get what you're saying it looks like I'm trying to lay a trap. Sure if I had no reputation on here that's reasonable but I haven't done anything of the like to screw anybody over. If you're going to use my bet against Bic as an example of my deplorable conduct Bic is not new to betting and knows full well what he's doing. He could have easily refused the live bet I offered and as it was he ended up winning. Half the forum posted after the game about how Clemson was such an obvious lock and only squares would put down on ND but I'm the snake for posting a live bet?
You're an idiot if you actually think I'm out here to scam people.