d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > Sports Coliseum > Football & Rugby > List Update
Prev14567817Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 45,936
Joined: Jun 4 2007
Gold: 0.00
Oct 18 2017 06:49pm
Quote (GoAGoA @ Oct 18 2017 06:25pm)
Sounds dumb... if I bet and win on early games (so it is my fg) but the guy isnt on... I am not allowed to bet on afternoon games? fk that shit.

Additionally... there are many people who can easily buy fg to account for losses if needbe.There is a reason there is a 24 hour payback period.


That's if you are offline you have 24hrs to pay. If you are online during those 24hrs you better pay your bets, or you will be tagged, period.

This post was edited by SheriffCool on Oct 18 2017 06:50pm
Member
Posts: 42,076
Joined: Mar 17 2010
Gold: 10,260.50
Oct 18 2017 06:55pm
Quote (Crashnburn_819 @ Oct 18 2017 03:28pm)
There is no 24 hour period.


Since? If I lose a bet I have to pay the moment the game is over?No, I don't, otherwise, tx6 is getting tagged.
Member
Posts: 9,798
Joined: Mar 20 2009
Gold: 0.00
Oct 18 2017 07:00pm
Dumb cuz post 11
Member
Posts: 45,936
Joined: Jun 4 2007
Gold: 0.00
Oct 18 2017 07:01pm
Quote (MilkMaid @ Oct 18 2017 08:55pm)
Since? If I lose a bet I have to pay the moment the game is over?No, I don't, otherwise, tx6 is getting tagged.


If you are online and posting there is no reason not to pay your bet, someone with 200 fg could bet the 1 pm game and not pay you, bet the 4pm game and not pay the next guy vs the same fg you wagered against, and bet Sunday night game with same fg, and maybe an nba or ncaa basketball game as well, and not pay anyone and welch at least 3 or 4 people in that time frame. That's why the rule is in place. We aren't going to be unreasonable, but we aren't going to tolerate people being dicks and holding fg for a day because they want to be a dick because they lost or don't like who they bet and want to fuck with them, another reason this is in place.

This post was edited by SheriffCool on Oct 18 2017 07:07pm
Member
Posts: 56,427
Joined: Oct 29 2014
Gold: 1,252.00
Oct 18 2017 07:02pm
Quote (MilkMaid @ Oct 17 2017 11:35pm)
No.
People make bets with tx6, and since he has so many of them, he would start getting blown up with messages/gold logs etc.

I understand what you're trying to get at, but if I won a bet and the user that I sent uf to isn't on, and it's an early game, why couldn't I use those winnings to place another bet? It should be up to the person who is accepting the bet.


This way of thinking is why everyone has credit card debt.
Member
Posts: 42,076
Joined: Mar 17 2010
Gold: 10,260.50
Oct 18 2017 07:10pm
Quote (SheriffCool @ Oct 18 2017 06:01pm)
If you are online and posting there is no reason not to pay your bet, someone with 200 fg could bet the 1 pm game not pay you, bet the 4pm game and not pay the next guy vs the same fg you wagered against, and bet Sunday night game with same fg, and maybe an nba or ncaa basketball game as well, and not pay anyone and welch at least 3 or 4 people in that time frame. That's why the rule is in place.


This is a dumb rule, imo, only because of this fact, how does one have proof that person doesn't have the said fg to cover the bet? For example, take me, I've got "679fg" that's not being mediated, but if I were to post my actual amount, I would be bombarded for donations/loans, so how does someone differentiate from mediated and not mediated fg?

I can tell you now I'm holding more fg, that is mine than I'm stating, does that make me a welcher?
Member
Posts: 42,076
Joined: Mar 17 2010
Gold: 10,260.50
Oct 18 2017 07:13pm
Quote (Rust_Ninja @ Oct 18 2017 06:02pm)
This way of thinking is why everyone has credit card debt.


My cc bill is at $42.xx, you mad?

This post was edited by MilkMaid on Oct 18 2017 07:14pm
Member
Posts: 67,551
Joined: Feb 4 2010
Gold: 99,750.37
Oct 18 2017 07:20pm
Quote (MilkMaid @ Oct 18 2017 06:10pm)
This is a dumb rule, imo, only because of this fact, how does one have proof that person doesn't have the said fg to cover the bet? For example, take me, I've got "679fg" that's not being mediated, but if I were to post my actual amount, I would be bombarded for donations/loans, so how does someone differentiate from mediated and not mediated fg?

I can tell you now I'm holding more fg, that is mine than I'm stating, does that make me a welcher?


Assuming that your amount is "679 fg" that is truly yours and you make a bet that is over that amount, then yes. It would classify you as one.

Think of it this way, if you weren't medding, could you have posted a higher amount for bet? No. The rule is that you cannot bet more than you have.

Just because you're medding a bet shouldn't give you the ability to bet more than you have because you can always "get it" somewhere. That's hella messed up.

I'm not sure why that's such a problem though. It's not like it's a NEW rule, it's clarifying a rule that wasn't explicit that should have been common sense.

Now, I get the idea that you made a bet and that person who lost haven't paid up and you're losing out on a bet. Yeah, that sucks. But the potential of someone being able to scam from the current system exists.

IE: Let's say it's a 10am game. You bet 100 fg and you win the fg. The med sends the fg but goes afk. You take your 200 fg and make a bet somewhere but let's say you have the evil intention of tricking someone to make some POSSIBLE fg. You find someone who wants to bet with you and you reference that it's a "med'd" fg and it hasn't been paid out (even though it has but since the med is afk, cannot confirm or deny).

So the idea of the rule is to eliminate even this possibility.

EDIT:: As far as your actual amount goes, people won't know unless you put it in sig or something of your actual amount. And it's upto the individual if they want to reveal that info or not.

This post was edited by Slowtoanger on Oct 18 2017 07:29pm
Member
Posts: 45,936
Joined: Jun 4 2007
Gold: 0.00
Oct 18 2017 07:30pm
Quote (MilkMaid @ Oct 18 2017 09:10pm)
This is a dumb rule, imo, only because of this fact, how does one have proof that person doesn't have the said fg to cover the bet? For example, take me, I've got "679fg" that's not being mediated, but if I were to post my actual amount, I would be bombarded for donations/loans, so how does someone differentiate from mediated and not mediated fg?

I can tell you now I'm holding more fg, that is mine than I'm stating, does that make me a welcher?


This is a dumb response, imo, "I lie about my fg amount so I don't have to say no to people asking for donates will I be welcher tagged if I overbet the amount I say isn't mediated?" LOL for fucks sakes yes you will. Just don't bet with gold that's not yours or not in your possession. It's not hard to figure out. If you lose a bet and are online pay it, simple. You don't have a day to pay if you are online. If you make a bet and know you are going to be offline for an extended period, use a med.
Member
Posts: 9,798
Joined: Mar 20 2009
Gold: 0.00
Oct 18 2017 07:32pm
Quote (MilkMaid @ Oct 18 2017 07:10pm)
This is a dumb rule, imo, only because of this fact, how does one have proof that person doesn't have the said fg to cover the bet? For example, take me, I've got "679fg" that's not being mediated, but if I were to post my actual amount, I would be bombarded for donations/loans, so how does someone differentiate from mediated and not mediated fg?

I can tell you now I'm holding more fg, that is mine than I'm stating, does that make me a welcher?


Don8
Go Back To Football & Rugby Topic List
Prev14567817Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll