d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > Sports Coliseum > Football & Rugby > Better Free Agency?
Prev1456
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 13,507
Joined: May 5 2009
Gold: 24.00
Mar 15 2014 09:48pm
tampas fa >
Member
Posts: 9,483
Joined: Jul 22 2006
Gold: 250.10
Mar 15 2014 10:28pm
Quote (monstarr @ Mar 15 2014 10:12pm)
ravens are pretty bad at it too


The Seahawks best WR missed 90% of the season right?

Ravens WRs > seacocks
Member
Posts: 12,542
Joined: Jun 11 2007
Gold: 74.01
Warn: 20%
Mar 17 2014 06:59pm
So they had an offer for Allen, and when Ware became available they yanked the deal and gave it to Ware. Doesnt that mean that Allen was on their wish list, and not Ware???

They offered a deal to DRC, who declined. So they offered a deal to Revis, who declined, so they offered the deal to Talib who accepted. And you expect me to believe Talib was on their wish list??? There 2 biggest moves were Plan C at CB and Plan B at the pass rushing spot.

Get real. They made some good moves, but are they significantly better than last year??? I think they are slightly better, but not significantly better. Talib and Ward are upgrades, no question. But Phillips had like 11 sacks last year and they paid him like $2mil. So they signed Ware, who will get them 11 sacks (just like Phillips did) at 500% the cost. So I dont see any gain there. And on offense, they lose their best pass protector at the RB position, they lost Zane Beadles from the offensive line, they lost Decker and gained Sanders. That looks to me like a net loss on offense

Meanwhile, New England (who was only 10 points behind Denver) has made significant upgrades. Revis/Browner are far better than Talib/Gregory, they will have Mayo and Tommy Kelly back from injury, Edelman returns, Gronk is back from injury, added LaFell… I would think that the defensive additions/players returning from injury alone closes the 10 point gap. It will be very interesting to see how it plays out on the field.
Member
Posts: 59,137
Joined: Jan 19 2005
Gold: 26.51
Warn: 10%
Mar 17 2014 07:02pm
Giants getting in this FA hoopla for once.... joining the party :banana:





Signed:

DRC
Schwartz
Jennings
J.D. Walton
Thurmond
McClain
Demps
Holiday

Member
Posts: 17,850
Joined: Jul 29 2009
Gold: 245.00
Mar 17 2014 07:34pm
Quote (xoxocrazi @ Mar 17 2014 07:59pm)
So they had an offer for Allen, and when Ware became available they yanked the deal and gave it to Ware. Doesnt that mean that Allen was on their wish list, and not Ware???

They offered a deal to DRC, who declined. So they offered a deal to Revis, who declined, so they offered the deal to Talib who accepted. And you expect me to believe Talib was on their wish list??? There 2 biggest moves were Plan C at CB and Plan B at the pass rushing spot.

Get real. They made some good moves, but are they significantly better than last year??? I think they are slightly better, but not significantly better. Talib and Ward are upgrades, no question. But Phillips had like 11 sacks last year and they paid him like $2mil. So they signed Ware, who will get them 11 sacks (just like Phillips did) at 500% the cost. So I dont see any gain there. And on offense, they lose their best pass protector at the RB position, they lost Zane Beadles from the offensive line, they lost Decker and gained Sanders. That looks to me like a net loss on offense

Meanwhile, New England (who was only 10 points behind Denver) has made significant upgrades. Revis/Browner are far better than Talib/Gregory, they will have Mayo and Tommy Kelly back from injury, Edelman returns, Gronk is back from injury, added LaFell… I would think that the defensive additions/players returning from injury alone closes the 10 point gap. It will be very interesting to see how it plays out on the field.


Thought revis was still on the bucs when they signed talib? Also cromartie declined because the contract was backloaded with minimum guaranteed. He would've been cut far before he seen any good money
Member
Posts: 126,173
Joined: Oct 14 2009
Gold: 133.70
Mar 17 2014 09:00pm
Quote (Detroitt @ Mar 15 2014 11:28pm)
The Seahawks best WR missed 90% of the season right?

Ravens WRs > seacocks

Gary Kubiak is going to have Joe Flacco running a ton of bootlegs, roll outs, play-action passes.
Ray Rice better be ready and healthy enough to have a career high in carries in 2014 as well.
It's kind of weird that Mike Shanahan was too old to succeed but Gary Kubiak is a younger clone.
His son Kyle Shanahan comes from the same coaching tree and is the Browns offensive coordinator.
Member
Posts: 23,226
Joined: Mar 5 2010
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 10%
Mar 17 2014 09:04pm
Quote (Madmartigan @ Mar 17 2014 11:00pm)
Gary Kubiak is going to have Joe Flacco running a ton of bootlegs, roll outs, play-action passes.
Ray Rice better be ready and healthy enough to have a career high in carries in 2014 as well.
It's kind of weird that Mike Shanahan was too old to succeed but Gary Kubiak is a younger clone.
His son Kyle Shanahan comes from the same coaching tree and is the Browns offensive coordinator.


Rice supposedly experimented with his workout regemine and put on too much muscle weight last year. He has already lost 15 lbs.

They like Pierce as a 1-cut back, kind of reminiscent of Foster, so it wouldn't surprise me if Rice's numbers still fall well short of what he used to do.

This post was edited by Terps on Mar 17 2014 09:04pm
Member
Posts: 453
Joined: Dec 14 2013
Gold: 0.01
Mar 18 2014 12:24am
Broncos top 1
Member
Posts: 14,966
Joined: Jul 24 2008
Gold: 11.69
Mar 18 2014 12:33am
Bronchos top 1
Go Back To Football & Rugby Topic List
Prev1456
Add Reply New Topic New Poll