d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > Sports Coliseum > Football & Rugby >
Poll > Would You Bash The Giants/eli If Xnozx Wasn't > On This Forum?
Prev14567Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Views: 507Replies: 61Track Topic
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 8,682
Joined: Dec 9 2009
Gold: 0.00
#51
Oct 5 2011 11:47pm
Quote (Boggy @ Oct 6 2011 12:45am)
Buffalo isn't in Canada?


Basically.....
Member
Posts: 56,582
Joined: Sep 26 2005
Gold: 14,050.05
#52
Oct 5 2011 11:47pm
Quote (Labeq9947 @ Oct 6 2011 12:41am)
Kids a moron.. tries to make himself look like hes better than us nerds.... basically making fun of us for having friends on a site and being on a site and like were trying to fit in by following and conforming by agreeing with eacother and disagreeing with him. We dont agree with eachother because we wanna make friends, it just coincidence that our opinions match. Sorry that Eli isnt Elite or better than average, sorry that im not a virgin. And youre doing the exact same thing that we are only difference is that your opinions conflict and you make 15000 threads a week.... so if youre gunna try and make us look like idiots for posting here, then Mick and I are just wondering.. WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU DOING HERE


He tries to let him know how much better than us he is by making threads telling us how many thousands of dollars he's betting each week on football too.
Member
Posts: 8,682
Joined: Dec 9 2009
Gold: 0.00
#53
Oct 5 2011 11:50pm
Quote (VickIsSick07 @ Oct 6 2011 12:47am)
He tries to let him know how much better than us he is by making threads telling us how many thousands of dollars he's betting each week on football too.


Yah.. were poor and stupid. Hes smart and rich. Must be nice to not be a peasant.
Member
Posts: 18,138
Joined: Dec 4 2006
Gold: 0.01
#54
Oct 5 2011 11:50pm
Quote (VickIsSick07 @ Oct 6 2011 12:47am)
He tries to let him know how much better than us he is by making threads telling us how many thousands of dollars he's betting each week on football too.


He's rolling in that electrician* money ya feel me

This post was edited by MotorCityScrubs on Oct 5 2011 11:51pm
Member
Posts: 51,331
Joined: Feb 18 2007
Gold: 0.27
#55
Oct 5 2011 11:59pm
Quote (Suggs @ Oct 5 2011 10:03pm)
I hate the Giants anyway. Def in my top 10 hated teams.

xnozx is hilarious, I don't know why you all hate him so much.


Pretty much agree with this except it's top 2 for me, with the Packers in there too lol.

But, xnozx is just pure entertainment. No hate at all. Without him, this forum would be more boring than it already is.
Member
Posts: 19,236
Joined: Jun 23 2006
Gold: 0.04
#56
Oct 6 2011 01:19am
Quote (xnozx. @ Oct 6 2011 05:24am)
You have a top 5 O-Line in the NFL. Just because they haven't played like that one game doesn't mean they suck.


They haven't played that way the past 3 games really...Mangold's been out 11 quarters. It didn't matter vs. the Bengals, but jeez.

Also, Ryan isn't going back to ground and pound because Sanchez sucks, it's because the Jets haven't been able to establish a running game at all. Eli isn't perfect either when the Giants aren't playing like a run-first team. Take some of the pressure off him. Every team needs to be able to grind out the clock and move the chains and a consistent running game helps to do just that. Colt McCoy had 61 pass attempts last week AND HIS TEAM STILL RAN FOR MORE YARDAGE THAN THE JETS DID LAST WEEK.

The Jets just want to be sure they're actually ABLE TO DO IT. Having a balanced attack is pretty helpful. Sanchez didn't play that bad in the Oakland loss - 100% not his fault.
Sanchez was 27/44 for 369 yards, 2 TD passing, 1 TD rushing, and 1 INT. 96.0 passer rating. That also doesn't count his other rushing TD that was overturned; nor does it factor in his O line playing horribly. The Raiders were 0/8 on third down, and were outgained in passing yardage more than 2:1 ratio. Sanchez was doing fine. The Jets DEFENSE allowed 234 rushing yards. That's not Sanchez's fault.

Moore took a reverse that the Jets appeared to have stopped. But Moore cut upfield to elude David Harris and Samson Satele flattened Jim Leonhard with a block, springing Moore for the touchdown that made it 24-17.

Sanchez wasn't botching the tackles, was he?
Member
Posts: 54,839
Joined: Jul 31 2007
Gold: 1,930.00
#57
Oct 6 2011 01:42am
yes but xnoxz allows it to be that much more enjoyable
Member
Posts: 10,748
Joined: Feb 28 2010
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 10%
#58
Oct 6 2011 01:43am
Quote (Falcon_A @ Oct 6 2011 01:19am)
They haven't played that way the past 3 games really...Mangold's been out 11 quarters. It didn't matter vs. the Bengals, but jeez.

Also, Ryan isn't going back to ground and pound because Sanchez sucks, it's because the Jets haven't been able to establish a running game at all. Eli isn't perfect either when the Giants aren't playing like a run-first team. Take some of the pressure off him. Every team needs to be able to grind out the clock and move the chains and a consistent running game helps to do just that.  Colt McCoy had 61 pass attempts last week AND HIS TEAM STILL RAN FOR MORE YARDAGE THAN THE JETS DID LAST WEEK.

The Jets just want to be sure they're actually ABLE TO DO IT. Having a balanced attack is pretty helpful. Sanchez didn't play that bad in the Oakland loss - 100% not his fault.
Sanchez was 27/44 for 369 yards, 2 TD passing, 1 TD rushing, and 1 INT. 96.0 passer rating. That also doesn't count his other rushing TD that was overturned; nor does it factor in his O line playing horribly. The Raiders were 0/8 on third down, and were outgained in passing yardage more than 2:1 ratio. Sanchez was doing fine. The Jets DEFENSE allowed 234 rushing yards. That's not Sanchez's fault.

Moore took a reverse that the Jets appeared to have stopped. But Moore cut upfield to elude David Harris and Samson Satele flattened Jim Leonhard with a block, springing Moore for the touchdown that made it 24-17.

Sanchez wasn't botching the tackles, was he?


How many times has Sanchez bailed out his defense's failures? How many times has the defense bailed out for Sanchez' failures?

About a 1:10 ratio here

This post was edited by Wisco on Oct 6 2011 01:44am
Member
Posts: 40,721
Joined: Jan 9 2007
Gold: 83.00
#59
Oct 6 2011 01:59am
Danny is worse.
Member
Posts: 150,002
Joined: Apr 19 2005
Gold: 290.11
#60
Oct 6 2011 02:07am
Quote (fuzzy159 @ Oct 6 2011 03:59am)
Danny is worse.


Vouch.
Go Back To Football & Rugby Topic List
Prev14567Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll

© 2003-2026 d2jsp  Contact