Pretty stupid way of comparing QBs, considering wins are a team stat. I guess Trent Dilfer is a great QB despite being terrible, owning one of the single worst seasons of any QB ever: https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/D/DilfTr00/gamelog/1995/

What the fuck??? 4td and 18ints?? What the actual fuck

i agree but thats the way it is. If this were true Dan Marino would be the undisputed goat.

Being sacked 47 times didn't help lol.

No he wouldn't. And there's a pretty big difference between a playoff win and a Super Bowl win...

Dude, do you literally search my posts and disagree with everything i say? careers are measured by postseason success. I shouldn't have to spell it out to you that if a QB has zero playoff wins obviously he doesnt have any superbowls either. I could have said they both have identical careers where it matters: zero superbowl wins, but i wanted to point out that stafford also never won a playoff game.

This post was edited by casedizzle45 on Aug 20 2017 06:41pm

Do you literally need to reach that hard to try and come up with something unrelated?

Since it needs to be spelled out for you, I was stating that Marino isn't a good comparison because he had playoff wins. It's the Super Bowl that he's lacking. I didn't say anything about Stafford or Wentz...

Well I figured terps brought up dilfer because of his Super Bowl win, so that's why I brought up Marino. I guess he could have been speaking about just his playoff record alone.

Dilfer was 5-1 in the playoffs, but it's not like he really had a hand in those wins, hence why using playoff wins as a QB stat is dumb.

Yea I agree with that but it is generally the typical "barometer" used to measure one'a career.