I'm not sure how anyone can honestly look at the incredible efficiency of Aaron Rodgers and say Luck is better with his volume stats.

I think Luck's overrated-ness comes from 1) draft position, 2) media hype, 3) digging himself into a hole with turnovers and then coming back vs prevent defenses (or insane injuries and poor coaching in the Chiefs game), and 4) fantasy stats.

This post was edited by WrathOfGod1337 on Jun 19 2015 07:26pm

Sweet Jesus an interception machine being compared to Rodgers.

To be fair, Rodgers has highly touted receivers that were quite coveted in the draft. Everyone and their mother were after Jordy and Cobb ofc

Lol.
That's what happens when your defense is abysmal & running game is non-existant.
Pretty sure Luck broke Manning's pass attempt record.
I expect career numbers from Luck this year.

This post was edited by straightedgerevenge on Jun 19 2015 08:01pm

Cam newton

Whose saying Luck is better? I've only seen people saying they would prefer Luck's longevity.

I guess I didn't mean better, but a few people in this thread seemed to think they were equally talented, whereas I think Rodgers is in his own tier above everyone else.

Yeah no one is saying he's better but their skill sets are pretty much the same. Great long ball, accurate, ability to tuck and run.

I think luck is better skill sets

This post was edited by SoulOne on Jun 19 2015 08:47pm

I don't think anyone is confusing Salisa with someone who even knows a tiny bit about football. Simple mistake, Ricky