Patriots Next Years Sb Winners. - Topic

xnozx.

Member

Posts: 59,137

Joined: Jan 19 2005

Gold: 26.51

Warn: 10%

#41

Jan 18 2013 06:57pm

Quote (Ritchey9 @ Jan 18 2013 08:54pm)

To this all I can say is divisions dont mean shit once playoffs hit. You would understand if you made it.
You don't seem to understand no one is jealous of your rings, us patriot fans are successful year in and year out. You on the other hand clench onto barely making the playoffs. 3 rings 5 superbowls> 2rings

You want a round of applause because you can win a division with the talent level of expansion teams? Not a SINGLE team in your division even has a franchise QB. Not to mention COUNTLESS other flaws.

Congrats on all those hard fought division titles my man!

This post was edited by xnozx. on Jan 18 2013 06:58pm

Ritchey9

Member

Posts: 17,434

Joined: Mar 11 2012

Gold: 85.68

#42

Jan 18 2013 07:00pm

Quote (Crashnburn_819 @ Jan 18 2013 08:56pm)

Mhm. Tell yourself whatever you want. Anybody who is stupid enough to claim a teams' run is over two years after they won the Super Bowl when their own favorite team hasn't won it in 8 years only verballed themselves. I don't need to make an argument when you make a fool of yourself for me. Lose some of the bias and we'll talk.

One and done last year, got a gift in the first round this year and got smoked in the second.
The NFC is dominating and I wont deny the east division is a joke, but I dont think the packers can keep up with the young teams in the NFC.

And to whoever said the Packers are a much younger team you must be retarded

OtterJethro

Member

Posts: 26,417

Joined: Apr 20 2007

Gold: 1,550.01

#43

Jan 18 2013 07:01pm

Quote (xnozx. @ Jan 18 2013 05:44pm)

We're saying 8 wins would be all it would take for the Patriots to win the AFC East. So if the Patriots struggled one season because of injuries or whatever the reason, 8 wins would still easily take the division.

Like when they went 11-5 with Cassel and missed the playoffs?

Ritchey9

Member

Posts: 17,434

Joined: Mar 11 2012

Gold: 85.68

#44

Jan 18 2013 07:01pm

Quote (xnozx. @ Jan 18 2013 08:57pm)

Yes, its the patriots fault they dominate the divison. Just because your team cant handle rookie QBs don't get mad at me.

xnozx.

Member

Posts: 59,137

Joined: Jan 19 2005

Gold: 26.51

Warn: 10%

#45

Jan 18 2013 07:03pm

Quote (OtterJethro @ Jan 18 2013 09:01pm)

Like when they went 11-5 with Cassel and missed the playoffs?

Care to list the other years or you only want to put one anomaly under the microscope?

Ritchey9

Member

Posts: 17,434

Joined: Mar 11 2012

Gold: 85.68

#46

Jan 18 2013 07:05pm

Quote (xnozx. @ Jan 18 2013 09:03pm)

Care to list the other years or you only want to put one anomaly under the microscope?

Hasn't your division been shit for the past few years anyways?

TheLife

Member

Posts: 9,615

Joined: Nov 22 2007

Gold: 320.74

#47

Jan 18 2013 07:05pm

Didn't the Pats miss the playoffs a couple of years ago with a 11-5 record and didn't a NFC team that same year get in with a 7-9 record?

xnozx.

Member

Posts: 59,137

Joined: Jan 19 2005

Gold: 26.51

Warn: 10%

#48

Jan 18 2013 07:06pm

Quote (Ritchey9 @ Jan 18 2013 09:01pm)

Yes, its the patriots fault they dominate the divison. Just because your team cant handle rookie QBs don't get mad at me.

Any decent/good team would dominate that division...

Buccs
Chargers
Panthers
Rams

The Lions would of had double digit wins rather than 4.

Nice job shifting the focus of the debate because your losing the argument.

This post was edited by xnozx. on Jan 18 2013 07:08pm

Kayeto

Member

Posts: 43,761

Joined: Aug 27 2009

Gold: 63,142.89

#49

Jan 18 2013 07:07pm

its always too early.

49ers are already better than the Pats and gonna improve faster

eAiDz

Member

Posts: 12,067

Joined: Aug 9 2007

Gold: 2.00

#50

Jan 18 2013 07:08pm

So is everybody implying that because they have an easy road to the playoffs that as a team they aren't good/a threat?

I'm confused

Go Back To Football & Rugby Topic List