The guidelines are fine, it clearly states that a variation of the word "confirmed" must be made by both sides or no action will be taken.

There are even examples, if it's not clear enough already, then people here are just fucking retarded.

It is NOT our responsibility to make sure anyone reads the rules.

This post was edited by Mangina on Jan 10 2012 10:30pm

I'm sorry... wat.

I would be more than glad to help new bettors to the section(s). I always try to help when people troll new bettors looking for help.

We just need stricter guidelines, tbh



This situation is an example of one where a "variation" is simply not enough. The person at question can simply say that wanted spread, never got confirmed on their request (after receiving fg), and can send back the initial bet amount without having to lose their own fg in the process.

This post was edited by 18_1 on Jan 10 2012 10:31pm

i mean anyone else let on to that list, like Extort

his reply to the "new bettor" shoulda been that they needed to handle it in a thread

Technically it's not their job.



Does that mean even if Extort were to say "cd" instead of "cool, gl", technically it shouldn't count because it was done through PM?

I'm asking this to get a better understanding.

Doesn't clearly enough state what "a variation of the word confirmed" means. Which of the following words counts as a variation?

Cunfirmed
Cumfirmed
Cumformed
Cum formed
Cum for med

yes. just like jsp doesn't support pm trades, we don't support pm bets.

I see. Noted.

Further clarifying question, even if that PM bet stems from a thread bet, it doesn't matter or is there even a difference in that?

This post was edited by Slowtoanger on Jan 10 2012 10:34pm

Yep... I would not count that as a bet. It has to be posted in a thread as far as I am concerned.

It is enough, I don't see any way to make it more clear. It doesn't say "A variation of a confirmation" It says, "A variation OF THE WORD Confirmed"

If it's not clear enough, then what the fuck.