Quote (AshKC @ Jan 19 2025 09:53am)

For the fourth time now, you goofballs need to read. I didn't say we don't split, I said you wouldn't split this to -400. Moreover I followed up by including the values of all other books, pointing out how far off the moneyline supplied actually was.

I am not wrong, I was never wrong, and even OP admits he used a book that made him look shady.


For the love of god, read more and talk less when your IQ is at room temperature.

Quote (4killer7 @ Jan 20 2025 09:54pm)

Lol I’m not reading the endless wall of text from a random.


You’ll only be here for a few more weeks anyways

Quote (AshKC @ Jan 18 2025 08:39pm)

1. I am not a multi, have someone from the admin of this site run an IP trace and then get back to me on it with the findings.

2. The point was that the advertised odds were *SIGNIFICANTLY* greater than those available, on average across all sports books.

3. "splitting the difference" on moneyline wagers *ONLY* helps the person laying the favorite, and *HURTS* the person taking the underdog.

4. Choosing the most favorable book *FOR* the moneyline bettor, then "splitting the difference" results in significant value awarded to the person laying the favorite.


I cannot be more clear than that. If you're mad about any of those points I made, you probably need assistance with velcro shoes.