Quote (Noun @ Oct 27 2020 10:49pm)
I think there’s additional expectations aside from just being an active bettor. Discussion in game threads, contributions to the community, and just overall activity aside from just betting. So to that degree, the “active” tag for a “bettors list” is a misnomer. Of course, there were notable exceptions to that additional activity rule, such as tx6. I don’t think I’ve ever seen him post in any game or discussion threads. But in his defense, he ran a sports book for a year+, and would then basically donate all of his profits back into the community (e.g. baseball playoff freeroll awhile back), so that contributed to his trustworthiness.
There has been users in the past who bets 100k per bet on any random game (e.g. biiceps), but ultimately he ended up welching and scamming when he hit a cold streak. So the community is apprehensive to just let someone who bets big amounts for a few months get a tag.
For full disclosure, I have no vote for anything regarding the list.
Quote (Queefy @ Oct 27 2020 10:52pm)
Well its just browser add-on, but no worries. Just a couple ideas for you.
Quote (Hako @ Oct 27 2020 10:59pm)
The script is just an add-on extension for your browser. It shows who's active, trusted, med, welcher etc etc.
Appreciate your guys input. I don't have much more to say. I nominated people who've been active, they may not meet the requirements needed based on the standards it seems but they've all been active in the betting community and deserve consideration at a minimum. I made sure that I had a substantial case for all of the nominees before mentioning them. I either have gold logs of their action in my books or can easily provide links of their actions within the sports betting community. I know I'm still relatively new around here still and my opinion probably doesn't matter much and I understand that, but they have all been active the past year and anyone who actively bets would say the same.