Quote (TheE1337 @ Dec 2 2014 11:38pm)
Fitz, Floyd, AND Strong?
I could win an MVP award throwing to that core...
It'd be more like Jaelen Strong, John Brown and Juron Brown lol. Fitz likely isn't back next year. If he is, it's at a drastically reduced price so that will come down to him in the end. As for Floyd, we wouldn't cut him since his price isn't too high but I mean the dude just hasn't shown what we all thought he would be. He's had plenty of time, shined when Fitz was on the field but when the focus is on him he's average.
Quote (Cheesehead @ Dec 2 2014 11:44pm)
what's with the flipping between Perryman and Kendricks? i'm not very familiar with either and am curious why GB would take one over the other
Meh? I like them both. I'm partial to Kendricks but Perryman is really good so it's just kind of how I'm feeling that particular week lol.
Quote (beavmf @ Dec 2 2014 11:45pm)
I just don't see how 9ers could ignore offense again two picks in a row. I'd say 2nd round should be focused on OL depth, or even another gamble at WR. Can't keep failing at WR picks forever, right?
Dorial Green-Beckam plz
At that point in round 2 there was no WR that was worth the spot. There was some OL for sure but Edwards is a tremendous prospect imo. Could have easily been Kouandjio or Grasu or Dismukes tough.
Quote (Hako @ Dec 2 2014 11:58pm)
Winston is a far better QB than Geno dude. No comparison. Winston shits all over him. And I'm not even the biggest fan of ol Crab Legs.
As for the Mock Randy, I don't see us taking a Guard that high. Beadles we just signed last year and they just drafted our RG in the 3rd this past draft. Last I checked PFF, he (Linder our rookie RG) was graded out as our best guy on the OL.
Straight up, idk why I gave you guys a guard. I didn't really think you needed one but I was just busting this out quick after class last night and was just thinking shit the more protection for Bortles the better haha.
Quote (BardOfXiix @ Dec 3 2014 01:31am)
Could you see any teams (Raiders included, but not exclusively) trading back into the first if Gurley is still available late, or is that something you don't anticipate happening?
Oh I expect this to happen for sure with him and/or Gordon. RBs, even elite ones, just aren't worth high firsts. I had Gurley going high early on but I knew it'd never happen even before the injury. Now he could honestly fall to the third round (doubtful but possible). But, depending how the first pans out, teams like Oakland, the Jets, Buccs, Giants or Panthers could all be players to hop back into the end of the first to snatch either of them up.
Quote (chemoshots @ Dec 3 2014 09:14am)
godly draft for packers, but i don't see funchess making it that far or davis making it that far
Davis has been slipping in a lot of rankings that I have seen. He's kind of been middle pack for mine thus far. I like him but not in love with him. Second round yeah I can see that but end of the second, early third seems more realistic, I just didn't have a good spot for him until the Packers. As for Funchess, idk man it all depends on how teams see him. He needs to improve his blocking and just become a full blown tight end to really help himself. If he tried to be a receiver, I probably wouldn't draft him until the fifth. Notice how I've never listed him as a WR or TE/WR? lol.
Quote (Benny21 @ Dec 3 2014 10:57am)
oh shit i love the mike davis pick in round 3. I think he'll be a good pro
Yeah I like him a lot too. There's a lot of quality RB talent this year.