d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > Sports Coliseum > Football & Rugby > Kyle Pew Pew Rittenhouse Verdict:
Prev1242526272831Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Views: 2307Replies: 301Track Topic
Member
Posts: 23,664
Joined: Jan 18 2010
Gold: 30,000.00
#251
Nov 22 2021 03:11pm
Quote (Return_of_Jeremy_Fisher @ Nov 22 2021 02:50pm)
Since when is defending property by means of lethal force legal?


I never said I personally care about legality.
Anyone who wants to fuck with my stuff is gon die.
I live in the remote north. Theres a lot of places to bury a body.

"Shoot. Shovel. Shutup."
Member
Posts: 19,465
Joined: Jan 31 2016
Gold: 4,994.91
#252
Nov 22 2021 03:12pm
who
Member
Posts: 42,979
Joined: Oct 9 2010
Gold: 21.69
#253
Nov 22 2021 03:13pm
Had to get caught back up on this thread, sounds like billsmafia and josh would get along famously.


Quote (Odell @ Nov 22 2021 01:12pm)
who


Finland doesnt have news? Or they dont care about american news?

This post was edited by VAS3CT0MY on Nov 22 2021 03:20pm
Member
Posts: 150,017
Joined: Apr 19 2005
Gold: 290.11
#254
Nov 22 2021 03:48pm
Quote (BillsMafia @ Nov 20 2021 05:08pm)
To me and as I've said, and is my opinion, that he went into this thing wanting to use that gun. thats it.


That's completely irrelevant and doesn't matter one bit.

Wanting to use the gun is not illegal. He ACTUALLY used it correctly, defending himself against attackers. That's what matters.

A lot of people WANT to use their guns all the time, it doesn't mean they do until they actually have to for self defense like Rittenhouse did.



Member
Posts: 44,625
Joined: Feb 28 2008
Gold: 1,393.00
#255
Nov 22 2021 04:08pm
Quote (Sixers @ Nov 22 2021 04:48pm)
That's completely irrelevant and doesn't matter one bit.

Wanting to use the gun is not illegal. He ACTUALLY used it correctly, defending himself against attackers. That's what matters.

A lot of people WANT to use their guns all the time, it doesn't mean they do until they actually have to for self defense like Rittenhouse did.



I am hugely in support of strong gun control. I own guns. AR15s should not be allowed to be purchased.

That being said, the only thing he is guilty of is being a dumbass.

This post was edited by Fgs on Nov 22 2021 04:09pm
Member
Posts: 18,712
Joined: Mar 7 2010
Gold: 1,251.41
#256
Nov 22 2021 04:26pm
Quote (Fgs @ Nov 22 2021 03:08pm)
I am hugely in support of strong gun control. I own guns. AR15s should not be allowed to be purchased.

That being said, the only thing he is guilty of is being a dumbass.


yep
Member
Posts: 16,348
Joined: Oct 8 2021
Gold: 4.30
#257
Nov 22 2021 04:31pm
Quote (Fgs @ 22 Nov 2021 14:08)
I am hugely in support of strong gun control. I own guns. AR15s should not be allowed to be purchased.

That being said, the only thing he is guilty of is being a dumbass.


why does it matter what gun type?

as demonstrated a vehicle is far more deadly
Member
Posts: 12,568
Joined: Oct 3 2008
Gold: 5,700.00
#258
Nov 22 2021 04:44pm
Quote (Sixers @ Nov 22 2021 01:48pm)
That's completely irrelevant and doesn't matter one bit.

Wanting to use the gun is not illegal. He ACTUALLY used it correctly, defending himself against attackers. That's what matters.

A lot of people WANT to use their guns all the time, it doesn't mean they do until they actually have to for self defense like Rittenhouse did.


Yeah. bro. thats literally why I stated MY OPINION. no where did I ever say what he did was illegal. I'm just saying a 17 yr olds mind might be a little cartoonish when bringing a gun to a riot. He knew what he was getting into. thats why he brought the gun. At 17 or any age with a gun going into a riot, but especially before 18, you're not going into a burning city with an ar-15 without trying to hype yourself up to use to even go into the riots in the first place. At 17 I probably thought I'd be friggin Duke Nukem rolling into those riots. So again, I believe he defended himself..but did so with a smirk. needless to say its terrible parenting regardless.

This post was edited by BillsMafia on Nov 22 2021 04:44pm
Member
Posts: 150,017
Joined: Apr 19 2005
Gold: 290.11
#259
Nov 22 2021 04:45pm
Quote (BillsMafia @ Nov 22 2021 05:44pm)
Yeah. bro. thats literally why I stated MY OPINION. no where did I ever say what he did was illegal. I'm just saying a 17 yr olds mind might be a little cartoonish when bringing a gun to a riot. He knew what he was getting into. thats why he brought the gun. At 17 or any age with a gun going into a riot, but especially before 18, you're not going into a burning city with an ar-15 without trying to hype yourself up to use to even go into the riots in the first place. At 17 I probably thought I'd be friggin Duke Nukem rolling into those riots. So again, I believe he defended himself..but did so with a smirk.


I don't disagree with you

Kid is a punk, we can all see it. Not guilty, but still a punk.

Member
Posts: 42,979
Joined: Oct 9 2010
Gold: 21.69
#260
Nov 22 2021 04:49pm
The kid needs to be punish because we think something may have possibly been different if hypothetically maybe his skin was a different color. It's called Guilty by Hypothetical Scenario, pretty cut and dry if you ask me.
Go Back To Football & Rugby Topic List
Prev1242526272831Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll

© 2003-2026 d2jsp  Contact