d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > Sports Coliseum > Football & Rugby > Official New York Giants Fan Thread
Prev1247248249250251606Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 30,015
Joined: Aug 8 2007
Gold: 0.00
Jan 6 2013 06:30pm
Quote (xnozx. @ Jan 6 2013 06:13pm)
Man if we upgrade the O-line to give Eli time in the pocket and create holes for David Wilson.... holy shit this offense would be SO explosive... David Wilson can light up the scoreboard quick, just need to get better blocking

Team is not far off at all


don't we giants have least sacks in NFL 2012? IMO we need new offensive coordinator and better defensive players and defense.
Member
Posts: 47,605
Joined: Aug 19 2007
Gold: 41,504.11
Jan 6 2013 06:31pm
Quote (silent9 @ Jan 6 2013 04:30pm)
don't we giants have least sacks in NFL 2012? IMO we need new offensive coordinator and better defensive players and defense.


should take the term "we" loosely until the next superbowl champion is crowned
Member
Posts: 30,015
Joined: Aug 8 2007
Gold: 0.00
Jan 6 2013 06:39pm
Quote (lifehouse @ Jan 6 2013 06:31pm)
should take the term "we" loosely until the next superbowl champion is crowned


yeah OK
Member
Posts: 59,137
Joined: Jan 19 2005
Gold: 26.51
Warn: 10%
Jan 6 2013 06:39pm
Quote (silent9 @ Jan 6 2013 08:30pm)
don't we giants have least sacks in NFL 2012? IMO we need new offensive coordinator and better defensive players and defense.


Yea our pass rush was abysmal.

20 sacks........ that is pathetic

DEAD LAST in sacks...
Member
Posts: 28,172
Joined: Mar 2 2009
Gold: 0.00
Jan 6 2013 06:42pm
Quote (xnozx. @ Jan 6 2013 07:39pm)
Yea our pass rush was abysmal.

20 sacks........ that is pathetic

DEAD LAST in sacks...


giants only allowed 20 sacks... and they had 33 sacks
Member
Posts: 30,015
Joined: Aug 8 2007
Gold: 0.00
Jan 6 2013 06:44pm
Quote (MustangMan @ Jan 6 2013 06:42pm)
giants only allowed 20 sacks... and they had 33 sacks


that's what I meant
Member
Posts: 31,197
Joined: Mar 24 2010
Gold: 0.00
Jan 6 2013 06:45pm
Let's discuss relevant teams
Member
Posts: 59,137
Joined: Jan 19 2005
Gold: 26.51
Warn: 10%
Jan 6 2013 06:46pm
Quote (MustangMan @ Jan 6 2013 08:42pm)
giants only allowed 20 sacks... and they had 33 sacks


Why when I click on defense, sacks it says 20 for us?

Someone else posted this on the message boards about a month ago but I never bothered to read into it much. People were saying exactly what you just said.


reason we allowed such few sacks is because Eli is magician in the pocket. Flawless footwork and iss not afriad to throw it away or throw it down field which is what leads to INT's
Member
Posts: 30,015
Joined: Aug 8 2007
Gold: 0.00
Jan 6 2013 06:47pm
Quote (Tribeca @ Jan 6 2013 06:45pm)
Let's discuss relevant teams


wrong thread, this is new York giants thread.

Quote (xnozx. @ Jan 6 2013 06:46pm)
Why when I click on defense, sacks it says 20 for us?

Someone else posted this on the message boards about a month ago but I never bothered to read into it much. People were saying exactly what you just said.


reason we allowed such few sacks is because Eli is magician in the pocket. Flawless footwork and iss not afriad to throw it away or throw it down field which is what leads to INT's


makes much damn sense. Eli need to stop being dumb sometime.

This post was edited by silent9 on Jan 6 2013 06:49pm
Member
Posts: 28,172
Joined: Mar 2 2009
Gold: 0.00
Jan 6 2013 06:47pm
Quote (xnozx. @ Jan 6 2013 07:46pm)
Why when I click on defense, sacks it says 20 for us?

Someone else posted this on the message boards about a month ago but I never bothered to read into it much. People were saying exactly what you just said.


reason we allowed such few sacks is because Eli is magician in the pocket. Flawless footwork and iss not afriad to throw it away or throw it down field which is what leads to INT's


i just checked espn and it said 33

personally i believe eli needs to take more sacks instead of trying to force it downfield
Go Back To Football & Rugby Topic List
Prev1247248249250251606Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll