d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > Sports Coliseum > Football & Rugby > 2016 Team Needs
Prev123
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 922
Joined: Sep 5 2015
Gold: 113.00
Apr 14 2016 12:45am
Quote (SoulTwo @ Apr 13 2016 03:23pm)
ATL gets Reggie Rags, LB.


I hope not. I'm not a big fan of Reggie Ragland. NFL TE's will eat him alive. Alabama took him out on third downs or moved him to OLB to rush the passer (which he was below average there too).

saying all this. #ATL :locked: 2016ReggiegoingtoATLat17 troffedddd
Member
Posts: 31,164
Joined: Sep 5 2007
Gold: 775.01
Warn: 10%
Apr 15 2016 08:34pm
5. Jacksonville Jaguars (5-11) – DE, ILB, G, C, SS, CB, P, K, RB

IMO..

Jags - DE, LB, C, CB, LB
Member
Posts: 1,702
Joined: Mar 27 2016
Gold: 750.00
Warn: 10%
Apr 15 2016 09:05pm
Quote (Hako @ Apr 15 2016 06:34pm)
5. Jacksonville Jaguars (5-11) – DE, ILB, G, C, SS, CB, P, K, RB

IMO..

Jags - DE, LB, C, CB, LB


how many linebackers yeah'll need??
Member
Posts: 31,164
Joined: Sep 5 2007
Gold: 775.01
Warn: 10%
Apr 15 2016 09:14pm
Quote (SoulTwo @ Apr 15 2016 08:05pm)
how many linebackers yeah'll need??


as many as it takes
Member
Posts: 65,046
Joined: Jul 7 2008
Gold: Locked
Apr 16 2016 12:19am
Quote (Randolph @ Apr 12 2016 10:02pm)
14. Oakland Raiders (7-9) – LB, SS, DE, C, WR, RB, OT, CB


SS > LB > RB > WR (KR/PR). Any new DE would work rotation snaps. We've still got a starting C and both OTs now, and CB depth but could always look for potential elite talent. Our OL is actually super solid.

NFL offenses require a 3rd WR. We don't really have one. Sure we have players who can fill the void but we don't have three strong WRs. But more than that, we're going to need a 2nd RB for change of pace, sharing the load, and in case of injury. Right now if Murray goes down, our backup plan is either to feed our fullbacks or just abandon the running game. Very shallow at that position.

Safety is a bigger concern than LB. We've got Malcom Smith and Bruce Irvin to cover the outsides, and the MLB spot can be somewhat disregarded because of the help we can provide from other places (against the run, solid DTs. against the pass, help from S/OLBs/pass rush). Safety, however, does a lot of work in our scheme working over the top and covering deep WRs/TEs 1 on 1. Really need to lock down that position with someone who can ball hawk. The need here is very dependent on whether or not we're considering T.J. Carrie a CB or a S. He played well at CB last year and could easily be our reliable nickle back, meaning CB is fairly well covered. Or if he stays at safety, we have a serviceable option for a starter. I really like him as a CB, so I'm pulling for some consideration at S.

Our return game is actually garbage though. We REALLY need some help there. Granted, not the most important position on the field. But that big German guy...
Member
Posts: 72,078
Joined: May 31 2008
Gold: 3,570.21
Apr 16 2016 12:31am
Brian acting like he didn't just check the box scores after every Raider game. You frontin yo
Member
Posts: 9,379
Joined: Sep 20 2014
Gold: 66,441.00
Apr 16 2016 08:58am
noticed the packers aren't in need of a punter here.. that couldn't be more not true.
Member
Posts: 65,046
Joined: Jul 7 2008
Gold: Locked
Apr 16 2016 09:06am
Quote (Benny21 @ Apr 13 2016 10:05am)
Oakland in order: SS, FS, ILB, RB, OT, C, WR, OLB, CB, DE


Nah we got the FS from Cinci in FA, FS should be relatively covered. I think OLB/DE are interchangeable, and I'd bump C>OT but other than that we're pretty much in agreement.

The one thing that terrifies me about our roster is how shallow we are. We've got good starters, but we're really walking on egg shells in terms of injury plans. Anyone goes down outside of OL and we're in trouble.
Go Back To Football & Rugby Topic List
Prev123
Add Reply New Topic New Poll