d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > Sports Coliseum > Football & Rugby > 2013 Do Not Draft
Prev12345Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 51,331
Joined: Feb 18 2007
Gold: 0.27
May 6 2014 12:28am
Quote (Terps @ May 5 2014 11:26pm)
He'll probs be gone anyway.

If Lewan, C-dix, Gilbert, Dennard, and Ebron are all taken, idk who I want...

Zack Martin is meh...


Why do you want Dix? I thought you guys needed a SS?

And no WR? Cooks would be legit to learn behind Steve Smith and be the #3 until ss retires.
Member
Posts: 23,226
Joined: Mar 5 2010
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 10%
May 6 2014 12:32am
Quote (Randolph @ May 6 2014 02:28am)
Why do you want Dix? I thought you guys needed a SS?

And no WR? Cooks would be legit to learn behind Steve Smith and be the #3 until ss retires.


We need a FS, an Ed Reed center fielder FS.

And Cooks is tied /w a bunch of other guys (Lee, OBJ, I really like Matthews, but he'd probably a late 1/early 2) so it's w/e if we draft him or some other position. I like them all evenly.
Member
Posts: 51,331
Joined: Feb 18 2007
Gold: 0.27
May 6 2014 12:35am
Quote (Terps @ May 5 2014 11:32pm)
We need a FS, an Ed Reed center fielder FS.

And Cooks is tied /w a bunch of other guys (Lee, OBJ, I really like Matthews, but he'd probably a late 1/early 2) so it's w/e if we draft him or some other position. I like them all evenly.


Mother fucker you told me Elam was only playing SS because he had to but you were moving him back to FS. Gotta stop with the false information.
Member
Posts: 31,164
Joined: Sep 5 2007
Gold: 775.01
Warn: 10%
May 6 2014 12:36am
Quote (Randolph @ May 5 2014 11:35pm)
Mother fucker you told me Elam was only playing SS because he had to but you were moving him back to FS. Gotta stop with the false information.


? I've seen him say more than once that when Elam goes back to his real position (SS), he should do much better
Member
Posts: 51,331
Joined: Feb 18 2007
Gold: 0.27
May 6 2014 12:37am
Quote (Hako @ May 5 2014 11:36pm)
? I've seen him say more than once that when Elam goes back to his real position (SS), he should do much better


Maybe I'm confused, it's entirely possible lol. :blush:
Member
Posts: 23,226
Joined: Mar 5 2010
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 10%
May 6 2014 12:37am
Quote (Randolph @ May 6 2014 02:35am)
Mother fucker you told me Elam was only playing SS because he had to but you were moving him back to FS. Gotta stop with the false information.


We must have had a miscommunication; you've got it all backwards.

Elam was playing FS because James Ihedigbo stepped up to be a poor-man's Pollard, and Michael Huff never played a game at FS after getting sodomized by Peyton/Julius Thomas week 1.

But Ihedigbo is gone, so Elam will move into his natural role as SS next year.

This post was edited by Terps on May 6 2014 12:38am
Member
Posts: 51,331
Joined: Feb 18 2007
Gold: 0.27
May 6 2014 12:38am
Quote (Terps @ May 5 2014 11:37pm)
We must have had a miscommunication; you've got it all backwards.

Elam was playing FS because James Ihedigbo stepped up to be a poor-man's Pollard, and Michael Huff never played a game at FS after getting sodomized by Peyton/Julius Thomas week 1.


No you're right, I flipped them back to what I was originally thinking forever ago. Idk, I'm going to bed lol.

Night guys.
Member
Posts: 72,078
Joined: May 31 2008
Gold: 3,570.21
May 6 2014 01:41am
Quote (Randolph @ May 6 2014 01:38am)
No you're right, I flipped them back to what I was originally thinking forever ago. Idk, I'm going to bed lol.

Night guys.


Member
Posts: 65,046
Joined: Jul 7 2008
Gold: Locked
May 6 2014 02:29am
Yeah, if Watkins and Clowney are gone I think Oakland's gotta look for a trade. Robinson and Matthews are great talents, and you can never have too much OL, but there are WRs out there that could fill a bigger need...there are DTs, there are CBs, there are QBs. Depth in this draft really helps us out. Ideally if we trade back we get Cooks.

Wouldn't be mad about Robinson/Matthews pick at #5 but would be a wasted opportunity. None of the QBs really speak to me at #5, and since it's VERY likely that one of the big names will be available in the 2nd round, just wait. Just wait.
/e
Just looked at the perfect draft you linked and...no. We had better not take Evans at #5. We need a big play WR that can stretch the field...we have possession guys with decent hands. Need something to give our offense a spark when we're struggling, and while Evans is the kind of guy that can reliably bring in 1st down catches, that's not what our team is missing.

We do get WR, DT, CB, QB and those are our need positions, but...no. Not Evans first.

Finally, how do you feel about Ebron to NYG?

This post was edited by BardOfXiix on May 6 2014 02:34am
Member
Posts: 31,164
Joined: Sep 5 2007
Gold: 775.01
Warn: 10%
May 6 2014 02:42am
Quote (BardOfXiix @ May 6 2014 01:29am)
Yeah, if Watkins and Clowney are gone I think Oakland's gotta look for a trade.  Robinson and Matthews are great talents, and you can never have too much OL, but there are WRs out there that could fill a bigger need...there are DTs, there are CBs, there are QBs.  Depth in this draft really helps us out.  Ideally if we trade back we get Cooks.

Wouldn't be mad about Robinson/Matthews pick at #5 but would be a wasted opportunity.  None of the QBs really speak to me at #5, and since it's VERY likely that one of the big names will be available in the 2nd round, just wait.  Just wait.
/e
Just looked at the perfect draft you linked and...no.  We had better not take Evans at #5.  We need a big play WR that can stretch the field...we have possession guys with decent hands.  Need something to give our offense a spark when we're struggling, and while Evans is the kind of guy that can reliably bring in 1st down catches, that's not what our team is missing.

We do get WR, DT, CB, QB and those are our need positions, but...no.  Not Evans first.

Finally, how do you feel about Ebron to NYG?


do you really, HONESTLY believe Clowney would make it past us at #3? lmao....
Go Back To Football & Rugby Topic List
Prev12345Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll