d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > Sports Coliseum > Football & Rugby > Tj
Prev1234515Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 43,761
Joined: Aug 27 2009
Gold: 63,142.89
Jan 10 2012 10:10pm
Quote (Valorcide @ Jan 10 2012 11:09pm)
I swear we have one of these issues a month, roughly. How long before we fix the loophole?


As long as people keep making bets without reading the rules.
Member
Posts: 51,728
Joined: Dec 8 2008
Gold: 2,250.00
Jan 10 2012 10:11pm
Quote (BebePearl @ Jan 10 2012 08:10pm)
it was "cool gl" after getting the fg


i need all the examples..otherwise shit gets made up


There are only so many way confirmed can be written.
Member
Posts: 36,960
Joined: May 6 2005
Gold: 1,339.51
Jan 10 2012 10:11pm
Quote (Valorcide @ Jan 10 2012 11:09pm)
I swear we have one of these issues a month, roughly. How long before we fix the loophole?


that rule was added to try to avoid gray areas. I can definitely understand pilot enforcing it. You have no idea how hard it used to be to figure out what was a welch and what wasn't.
Member
Posts: 20,596
Joined: Mar 9 2010
Gold: 230.00
Warn: 20%
Jan 10 2012 10:12pm
Quote (numone @ Jan 11 2012 04:10am)
ok i read the bet thread, just not the 45 page thread.

so sending u/f to someone doesn't confirm the bet? extort still had to post "CD"?


yeah
he probably didnt notice he received the 5k UF and was too busy posting in the game thread to send it back until the game was over, probably didnt want the bet

i dont think its a welch at all :santa:
Member
Posts: 36,960
Joined: May 6 2005
Gold: 1,339.51
Jan 10 2012 10:14pm
Quote (BLeming012590 @ Jan 10 2012 11:12pm)
yeah
he probably didnt notice he received the 5k UF and was too busy posting in the game thread to send it back until the game was over, probably didnt want the bet

i dont think its a welch at all  :santa:


if it were me, i would take responsibility for "holding" the 5K fg against the user's will and give him some type of extra fg at least. It doesn't seem to be a "welch" but it was sure as fuck "BM"
Member
Posts: 43,761
Joined: Aug 27 2009
Gold: 63,142.89
Jan 10 2012 10:14pm
Quote (BebePearl @ Jan 10 2012 11:10pm)
i need all the examples..otherwise shit gets made up


I kinda agree with BebePearl on this one.

If Extort can get away with this loophole, what would stop someone from saying "Confurmed" then if they lose the bet claiming it wasn't "confirmed"

Member
Posts: 3,699
Joined: Jun 28 2010
Gold: 20.00
Jan 10 2012 10:15pm
Quote (kayeto @ Jan 11 2012 12:14am)
I kinda agree with BebePearl on this one.

If Extort can get away with this loophole, what would stop someone from saying "Confurmed" then if they lose the bet claiming it wasn't "confirmed"


dun dun dun
Member
Posts: 36,960
Joined: May 6 2005
Gold: 1,339.51
Jan 10 2012 10:16pm
simple solution, use a med on every bet :P
Member
Posts: 51,728
Joined: Dec 8 2008
Gold: 2,250.00
Jan 10 2012 10:16pm
Quote (kayeto @ Jan 10 2012 08:14pm)
I kinda agree with BebePearl on this one.

If Extort can get away with this loophole, what would stop someone from saying "Confurmed" then if they lose the bet claiming it wasn't "confirmed"


That's a variation of Confirmed tho. And it's very obvious
Member
Posts: 31,184
Joined: Apr 29 2008
Gold: 511.10
Jan 10 2012 10:17pm
Quote (kayeto @ Jan 10 2012 10:14pm)
I kinda agree with BebePearl on this one.

If Extort can get away with this loophole, what would stop someone from saying "Confurmed" then if they lose the bet claiming it wasn't "confirmed"


confurmed would be a variation

and in my opinion, so is cool gl
Go Back To Football & Rugby Topic List
Prev1234515Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll