Avoiding a player who's production is almost entirely dependent on TDs because he doesn't get targets is terrible reasoning?

Why do you keep doing this to yourself?

Montgomery

You're confusing Robinson with hardman

No.... Hardman is entirely TD dependent, not almost entirely. Robinson has averaged 4 targets per game through three weeks.... I personally wouldn't feel comfortable starting a player with that low of targets when I've got available players who get 8-10. So again, why is my reasoning terrible, or is this where we start the backpedal dance again?

Not reading this after the first sentence.

You need help

One of these days you'll put together a coherent response.

At first I was wondering if it was just me, but then I noticed you get verballed no matter where you post here. Must be hard being downsey with a superiority complex.

Dur, you're dumb for saying a guy who only gets 4 targets a game might not get targets, durrrrrr.

So all the targets in a blowout game are going to Watkins and kelce? 15-20 targets each? Makes sense good reasoning. You're so good at fantasy football advice. Start a podcast and a column

Montgomery is a living legend around these parts

100% agreed.

They did in their first two games..... so yes, a logical person would assume that the trend would continue . Also pretending like it's either those two or Robinson and that there are no other choices, again showcases your close-minded mouth breather arguments.

Is it possible for you to shove your foot further in your mouth, or are we done here?

This post was edited by jadeoshbogosh on Sep 26 2019 05:39pm