Quote (Cheesehead @ Jan 31 2018 11:28am)
Well, you quoted Hako discussing the Chiefs and then said: "it's not as lopsided as you think". I'm used to you talking in circles but it's getting really bad lately. Why are you turning this on me when you literally contradicted yourself?
Of course it's good for the Redskins; now they have a mediocre QB to replace the best prospect they've had in decades.
The qoute of lopsided is because he isn't putting into consideration why the redskins would do the trade. So I was going from a redskins point of view, again it's pretty obvious the chiefs won the trade but to say it was robbery is not too accurate since the skins see it as they needed to get a QB and they aren't realistically giving up too much for one.
Next point you said "now a mediocre QB instead of the best prospect" it has been pretty obvious again for some time now Kirk wasn't going to be coming back because he hated Snyder. So saying they gave up on Kirk for alex isn't accurate either. Kirk hated the management and wasn't going to be signing any contract so it wasn't that they like alex more it's that the bridge was burned and they needed a new QB and they went for one.
I don't ever say "obvious" this many times but I feel like I have to dumb things down to help you out
This post was edited by 4killer7 on Jan 31 2018 10:58am