d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > Sports Coliseum > Football & Rugby > Official Oakland Raiders Fan Thread
Prev1148149150151152623Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 65,046
Joined: Jul 7 2008
Gold: Locked
Apr 7 2014 07:03pm
Quote (Intact @ Apr 7 2014 04:04pm)
then say you dont like that and you hate it..then maybe it will happen  :thumbsup:


MANZELGOD PLEASE SUM

Quote (Intact @ Apr 7 2014 05:12pm)
Would you guys be happy with a QB in round 2 or 3? Someone like  AJ McCarron, Aaron Murray, Tajh Boyd or David Fales? They all have potential to be good just need to learn and be molded. Maybe Schaub can help a bit. I am not saying have Schaub totally teach them everything because he isnt an elite QB like that, but he has had a decent career with good numbers and has played a while, he is a vet. I just dont want to take a QB with the #5 pick. I want Clowney, Mack or Watkins. If we cant get any of those guys at #5 then maybe trade down and pick up another pick??


Quote (Benny21 @ Apr 7 2014 05:52pm)
I'm definitely in favor of that. I would be okay with McCarron/Jimmy G/Derek Carr in round 2, and maybe David Fales in a later round. I don't really want Tajh Boyd though.


I'm on board with this. I don't know enough about the QBs to offer an opinion on which I'd want.

I think the only reason we don't take a QB in the 2nd is if we really like someone coming out of next year's draft class. We have a tough schedule so we'll likely have another high pick, so if there are 2-3 QBs we think we like that might declare next year, I could be okay with us not taking a QB in the 2nd (because then it's almost like we wasted a pick).
Member
Posts: 17,165
Joined: May 30 2007
Gold: 680.00
Apr 8 2014 05:22pm
I and along with half the world have a feeling that both Clowney and Mack are gona be gone at #5. Clowney most def will be gone which sucks i wanted a baller ass defensive player. OR i guess one of the 2 baller LT's will work also..Even though they just paid the big man Donald Penn..
hmm we shall see, cant wait for the draft

This post was edited by Intact on Apr 8 2014 05:22pm
Member
Posts: 65,046
Joined: Jul 7 2008
Gold: Locked
Apr 8 2014 05:33pm
Quote (Intact @ Apr 8 2014 04:22pm)
I and along with half the world have a feeling that both Clowney and Mack are gona be gone at #5. Clowney most def will be gone which sucks i wanted a baller ass defensive player. OR i guess one of the 2 baller LT's will work also..Even though they just paid the big man Donald Penn..
hmm we shall see, cant wait for the draft


Well, either one could play RT as well. After signing so many linemen this offseason I'd kind of like to see a skill position player though. Watkins or some defensive star, but the problem is we've basically run out of spots to start young guys on defense. So trading back would be a big win to me.
Member
Posts: 29,577
Joined: Oct 31 2007
Gold: 395.22
Apr 8 2014 05:35pm
Watkins clowney mack trade. In that order or fuck upper management. And fuck em even more if they draft manziel
Member
Posts: 17,165
Joined: May 30 2007
Gold: 680.00
Apr 8 2014 05:46pm
Quote (BardOfXiix @ Apr 8 2014 03:33pm)
Well, either one could play RT as well.  After signing so many linemen this offseason I'd kind of like to see a skill position player though.  Watkins or some defensive star, but the problem is we've basically run out of spots to start young guys on defense.  So trading back would be a big win to me.


Quote (OmegaRed07 @ Apr 8 2014 03:35pm)
Watkins clowney mack trade. In that order or fuck upper management. And fuck em even more if they draft manziel


Yeah we have signed a lot of defensive starters but not all of them are that great. What if we started Mack over Burnett? Roach, Moore and Mack? Looks pretty good on paper. And yeah we have signed a lot of lineman lets just hope they all stay healthy and play decent..

I would say Clowney, Mack and then Watkins. I really want a defensive stud over offense for our #5 pick. But i guess Watkins would for sure help the team so i wouldnt hate the pick. If we cant get any of those 3 then i say trade the pick and get another 2nd rounder.
Member
Posts: 42,835
Joined: Mar 16 2008
Gold: 70.00
Apr 8 2014 05:58pm
Anything new of today?
Member
Posts: 17,165
Joined: May 30 2007
Gold: 680.00
Apr 8 2014 06:55pm
Quote (TheBlackHole @ Apr 8 2014 03:58pm)
Anything new of today?


nope havent heard of anything lately.
Member
Posts: 29,577
Joined: Oct 31 2007
Gold: 395.22
Apr 9 2014 11:26am
Quote (Intact @ Apr 8 2014 06:46pm)
Yeah we have signed a lot of defensive starters but not all of them are that great. What if we started Mack over Burnett? Roach, Moore and Mack? Looks pretty good on paper. And yeah we have signed a lot of lineman lets just hope they all stay healthy and play decent..

I would say Clowney, Mack and then Watkins. I really want a defensive stud over offense for our #5 pick. But i guess Watkins would for sure help the team so i wouldnt hate the pick. If we cant get any of those 3 then i say trade the pick and get another 2nd rounder.


Watkins is gonna be a fucking stud. If we can get him at 5 and Carr in the second we have some serious potential to have a nice offense (granted we get a decent rb in the next 2-3 year's).
Member
Posts: 17,165
Joined: May 30 2007
Gold: 680.00
Apr 9 2014 08:32pm
Quote (OmegaRed07 @ Apr 9 2014 09:26am)
Watkins is gonna be a fucking stud. If we can get him at 5 and Carr in the second we have some serious potential to have a nice offense (granted we get a decent rb in the next 2-3 year's).


yea Watkins should be a stud but if we cant get him and idk which direction to go next if all 3 of those guys are gone. thats why i really wanted desean jackson so we could draft defense at #5 but oh well..if we get watkins hopefully hes a fuckin monster!! :thumbsup:
Member
Posts: 64,445
Joined: Jun 26 2007
Gold: 3.00
Apr 9 2014 08:44pm
Stop under rating barr. He's gonna be that guy raiders pass on and excel...
Go Back To Football & Rugby Topic List
Prev1148149150151152623Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll