The fact that you think replacing the head coach will do anything positive for the Packers is enough evidence that you either don't understand the game or you're bored and can't find anyone to reply to you on Facebook or via text.

Highly doubt he'll get sacked. It's really not fair to grade a coach on a season where the starting QB goes down, and even for that the team did pretty well.

What you guys need to do is change your scout team and your GM, IMO.
/e
Or at least your OL/DL people and your medical staff rofl

This post was edited by BardOfXiix on Dec 27 2017 12:18pm

Irony since youve had triple the post count Ive had for as long as I can remember

If you're advocating for Mike McCarthy as HC then I'm pretty sure its you that doesn't understand the game

Who’s a viable replacement?

Is it fair to say McCarthy botched a Super Bowl berth with his coaching decisions in the Seattle game?

I'd say there were a lot of opportunities that were missed on the field. I'd have to re-watch the game with coaching in mind, which is something I'm not likely to do. Obviously the Bostick moment and the 2 pt. conversion jump ball instantly come to mind.

Head coaches don’t grow on trees, replacing McCarthy would be stupid at this point since I don’t really see anyone better suited out there.

Different staff positions need replaced but HC is fine.

This post was edited by Acuity on Dec 27 2017 12:25pm

Run heavy offense in the 2nd half with Rodgers. Kicking a fg twice 4th and 1 on the 1. Analysts saying that McCarthy has had stale offense for years, little separation for receivers where Rodgers has to thread the needle on every pass

What does McCarthy do positively, seriously? Is it just for the simple sake of continuity... thats your argument? Look at the Steelers, they fired Dick LeBeau who was an all time genius DC and now they are producing on that end

This post was edited by Giannis on Dec 27 2017 12:28pm

Not opposed to run-heavy offense. Wasn't that a year they had a good rushing attack? Burning clock reliably is something that is good to do.

Not opposed to kicking field goals while ahead.

Packers offense tends to put up points. I think it would perform much better with an intact and functional OL, something Rodgers hasn't had the benefit of often.

Not really seeing where the argument against his coaching is from this standpoint.