d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > Sports Coliseum > Football & Rugby >
Poll > If You Can Pick A Team How Many Pick Aaron Rodgers > First If You Start Today
Prev123412Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Views: 1741Replies: 113Track Topic
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 72,078
Joined: May 31 2008
Gold: 3,570.21
#11
Jun 19 2015 12:31pm
Quote (WrathOfGod1337 @ Jun 19 2015 12:30pm)
It's basically whether you value a sure thing vs a prospect. Andrew Luck is overhyped if anyone thinks he is a top 5 QB right now. You would only take him over Rodgers with the hope that he can turn into Rodgers but play for you for 5 extra years. I'd rather just take the sure thing in Rodgers.


only thing Luck is Top 5 in is Fantasy Football
Member
Posts: 66,487
Joined: Aug 18 2009
Gold: 1,003.55
#12
Jun 19 2015 12:47pm
Quote (Cheesehead @ Jun 19 2015 02:31pm)
only thing Luck is Top 5 in is Fantasy Football


only thing that matters
Member
Posts: 28,686
Joined: Oct 15 2009
Gold: Locked
Trader: Scammer
Warn: 80%
#13
Jun 19 2015 02:09pm
Poor man's Brady
Member
Posts: 37,580
Joined: Jul 22 2008
Gold: Locked
Trader: Scammer
Warn: 10%
#14
Jun 19 2015 02:18pm
right now to build for the future? id take luck. both are elite, luck has the edge in age though.
Member
Posts: 72,078
Joined: May 31 2008
Gold: 3,570.21
#15
Jun 19 2015 02:19pm
Quote (Salisa @ Jun 19 2015 02:18pm)
right now to build for the future? id take luck. both are elite, luck has the edge in age though.


Rodgers has the edge in championships though.
Member
Posts: 37,580
Joined: Jul 22 2008
Gold: Locked
Trader: Scammer
Warn: 10%
#16
Jun 19 2015 02:28pm
Quote (Cheesehead @ Jun 19 2015 08:19pm)
Rodgers has the edge in championships though.


unless i misunderstood the question, going forward to build a team right now for the future, id take luck.

yes rodgers has had a better career, if thats what you're asking.

if it was just for next season then id take rodgers
Member
Posts: 32,893
Joined: Mar 9 2006
Gold: 22,460.59
#17
Jun 19 2015 02:30pm
Quote (Prone @ Jun 19 2015 11:36am)
He is, right now, for football
otherwise David Krejci is.



Dream on Prone Krejci is not the best even in hockey.

And yeah most likely A-Rodge... maybe Watt tho
Member
Posts: 8,630
Joined: Mar 24 2009
Gold: 8,000.00
#18
Jun 19 2015 02:32pm
Quote (Salisa @ Jun 19 2015 04:28pm)
unless i misunderstood the question, going forward to build a team right now for the future, id take luck.

yes rodgers has had a better career, if thats what you're asking.

if it was just for next season then id take rodgers


Pocket-passing QBs can play into their late 30s though. It's not like you're getting a declining Peyton Manning with 3 years in the tank. Rodgers is 31, in his prime, and can probably play until he's 39 or 40.
Member
Posts: 37,580
Joined: Jul 22 2008
Gold: Locked
Trader: Scammer
Warn: 10%
#19
Jun 19 2015 02:47pm
Quote (WrathOfGod1337 @ Jun 19 2015 08:32pm)
Pocket-passing QBs can play into their late 30s though. It's not like you're getting a declining Peyton Manning with 3 years in the tank. Rodgers is 31, in his prime, and can probably play until he's 39 or 40.


yeah but id still take luck.

e: i see them extremely equal on a skill level, luck's just a lot younger

This post was edited by Salisa on Jun 19 2015 02:48pm
Member
Posts: 52,835
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 250.00
#20
Jun 19 2015 02:57pm
hmmm very tough.

id probably take rodgers, but i could see luck being the most logical choice.

hard to compare early career luck vs early career rodgers, when rodgers didnt even play his first few seasons after being drafted.

a couple seasons from now, it would be hard to argue luck being as good or better than rodgers, assuming he continues to grow at the pace he has.
Go Back To Football & Rugby Topic List
Prev123412Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll

© 2003-2026 d2jsp  Contact