d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > Sports Coliseum > Hockey > Jsp 1k League
12314Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 47,317
Joined: Aug 27 2008
Gold: 30,000.00
Dec 16 2020 05:05pm
I'll try to host a 1k league this year.

If not enough people, maybe I'll drop the buy in to 500 fgs.

Was thinking about doing G, A, P, +/-, SOG, FW, HIT, BLK for forward/defensemen and W, GAA, SV%, SV for goalies.

2C
2LW
2RW
5D
1U
2G
4Bench
4IR
2IR+

Was also thinking of doing something new with the waivers this year, lmk what you guys think. Instead of being first come first serve for FA players, we would use the Continuous Waivers system with a Free Agent Budget for the year. Here's how it works :

Quote
In this mode, all unclaimed players are on waivers at all times. When a manager makes a claim to add a player, a clock starts, letting other managers have the chance to make a claim on the same player.


Quote
Each manager is given a budget that ranges between $1 (min) to $999,999,999 (max) to make offers on unclaimed players that are on waivers. The default budget is $100, but the commish of a Private League can adjust the budget as they see fit.

Offers are blind, so other managers can't see what your offer is.
Your offer can range from $0 to the remainder of your budget.
Highest offer at the end of the waiver period signs the player.
Offer amount is deducted from the manager's budget that signs the player.
Ties are broken by Continual Rolling List waiver priority.
Note - Your FAB budget does not replenish when it runs out. This budget is meant to last the entire season.


I'm trying to remove the "first come, first serve" setup. The way I'm suggesting everyone would have a shot if say a good prospect is called up.. Or if a #1 goalie goes down, everyone would have a fair shot at picking up his replacement.

Let me know what you guys think!
Member
Posts: 36,975
Joined: Jun 23 2007
Gold: 17.02
Dec 17 2020 10:21pm
If +- is in, PPP should be too. Whats P?
Continuous Waiver is better without any budget shit.

This post was edited by Rocko on Dec 17 2020 10:22pm
Member
Posts: 23,156
Joined: Nov 2 2009
Gold: 15,900.90
Dec 18 2020 01:47am
in
Member
Posts: 21,735
Joined: Dec 14 2007
Gold: 423.69
Dec 18 2020 11:10am
In if I can throw 1k together.... and thanks to my sugar daddy I have enough so I’m in

This post was edited by Bruin on Dec 18 2020 11:31am
Member
Posts: 5,957
Joined: Jun 11 2017
Gold: 0.50
Dec 19 2020 02:12pm
Im in
Member
Posts: 9,663
Joined: Aug 23 2004
Gold: 6,310.00
Dec 19 2020 07:02pm
I’d do it
Member
Posts: 15,339
Joined: Jan 7 2006
Gold: 23,685.49
Dec 21 2020 09:34am
RIP Cractic and the keeper league
Member
Posts: 42,979
Joined: Oct 9 2010
Gold: 0.69
Dec 21 2020 11:01am
In it to win it B)

This post was edited by Queefy on Dec 21 2020 11:01am
Member
Posts: 47,317
Joined: Aug 27 2008
Gold: 30,000.00
Dec 21 2020 06:22pm
Quote (Rocko @ Dec 17 2020 11:21pm)
If +- is in, PPP should be too. Whats P?
Continuous Waiver is better without any budget shit.


I feel like there's merit in scoring (and not getting scored on) at even strength, which is why I included +/-. I don't think you should be rewarded if one of your player scores on the PP because it's easier to score in that situation. P is just point. Scoring is the most important part of the game and I think it should be reflected in the categories.

Have you ever tried FAB? I know it's very popular in Fantasy Football but I have never personally tried it. Would you suggest continuous waivers with the player going to the last place team in the case of two people claiming the same player?

Also, you in?

1. Twax
2. equable
3. Bruin
4. Choade
5. slickjay
6. Queefy

I can also buy in a poor active they're short on fgs and are going to remain active throughout the season.
Member
Posts: 15,339
Joined: Jan 7 2006
Gold: 23,685.49
Dec 22 2020 07:23am
FAB is the way to go now if you have an experienced league. Otherwise I would just ride the default waiver setting.
Go Back To Hockey Topic List
12314Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll