i have run games in the past as active and always use dx, crispy or pens to be the medi
no issues.
i understand some people think this is a big deal and others dont, either way it dosent really matter as long as things are being handled with integrity and honesty. (which i feel is happening)
Quote (Nearin @ Dec 9 2015 03:33pm)
The only reason this wouldn't work is because the person who send to a med because they dont trust the active has insurance there fg is safe but not that there potential winnings are safe.
I see it as sort of an all or nothing circumstance. if one user wants a med ALL fg must go to the med.
I do think this is good as akinos points out it allows a proving grounds of sorts, my only issue is that we have a rule against it.
we shouldnt have a rule with special permissions based on undefined criteria as it just opens up room for accusations of bias and corruption.
Also i want to say thanks to akinos, haven't talked to you much even in my rare excursions out of hockey, but some solid / level headed contributions to the discussion.
this is kind of a slippery slope
what if some one has a problem with that med that gets sent the fg, does that med have to send to another med?
heres my take.... if you dont like it dont play.
i went to the casino this weekend and guess what there were tons of tables for me to chose from
poker? nope not unless it was a tourniquet, craps? nope i dont understand that shit, black jack? ahh yes! wait... i dont like this dealer, oh i know instead of throwing a fit ill go find another table