d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > Sports Coliseum > Hockey > Bettor Update Request - Read & Recommend
Prev19596979899104Next
Closed New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 50,655
Joined: Nov 18 2008
Gold: 4.00
Dec 9 2015 05:24pm
Quote (Pens @ Dec 9 2015 07:23pm)
This. I have moved myself to trusted for now because of new job. just not sure how often I will be here, and don't wanna be afk for 2+ days holding onto someones fg because I was too busy to check



I think I've moved the most lol at least 12 times
Member
Posts: 38,401
Joined: Feb 3 2006
Gold: 26.26
Dec 9 2015 05:24pm
Quote (Pens @ Dec 9 2015 06:23pm)
This. I have moved myself to trusted for now because of new job. just not sure how often I will be here, and don't wanna be afk for 2+ days holding onto someones fg because I was too busy to check


many people think med > trusted

i regularly move myself between the 2 based on how active i am, i rarely med anything anymore except the donation pot and series playoff bets though
Member
Posts: 32,895
Joined: Feb 26 2008
Gold: Locked
Trader: Scammer
Warn: 30%
Dec 9 2015 05:24pm
Quote (Darc-Deth @ Dec 9 2015 07:21pm)
med/trusted is the same thing btw, its their preference on whether they want to mediate or not or based on if they are going to be active or not


Oh.
Didn't know
Member
Posts: 26,437
Joined: Jan 20 2013
Gold: 982.86
Dec 9 2015 05:33pm
Quote (dirTyMan @ Dec 9 2015 07:07pm)
I would say the person who wants a med , sends their fg to a med, while the rest can just send it to the host.


The only reason this wouldn't work is because the person who send to a med because they dont trust the active has insurance there fg is safe but not that there potential winnings are safe.

I see it as sort of an all or nothing circumstance. if one user wants a med ALL fg must go to the med.

I do think this is good as akinos points out it allows a proving grounds of sorts, my only issue is that we have a rule against it.

we shouldnt have a rule with special permissions based on undefined criteria as it just opens up room for accusations of bias and corruption.

Also i want to say thanks to akinos, haven't talked to you much even in my rare excursions out of hockey, but some solid / level headed contributions to the discussion.
Member
Posts: 38,401
Joined: Feb 3 2006
Gold: 26.26
Dec 9 2015 05:35pm
Quote (Nearin @ Dec 9 2015 06:33pm)
The only reason this wouldn't work is because the person who send to a med because they dont trust the active has insurance there fg is safe but not that there potential winnings are safe.

I see it as sort of an all or nothing circumstance. if one user wants a med ALL fg must go to the med.

I do think this is good as akinos points out it allows a proving grounds of sorts, my only issue is that we have a rule against it.

we shouldnt have a rule with special permissions based on undefined criteria as it just opens up room for accusations of bias and corruption.

Also i want to say thanks to akinos, haven't talked to you much even in my rare excursions out of hockey, but some solid / level headed contributions to the discussion.


yes this
i like the general idea but i think it needs a nit of work to become viable
Member
Posts: 49,220
Joined: Oct 24 2003
Gold: 0.00
Dec 9 2015 06:08pm
i have run games in the past as active and always use dx, crispy or pens to be the medi

no issues.

i understand some people think this is a big deal and others dont, either way it dosent really matter as long as things are being handled with integrity and honesty. (which i feel is happening)



Quote (Nearin @ Dec 9 2015 03:33pm)
The only reason this wouldn't work is because the person who send to a med because they dont trust the active has insurance there fg is safe but not that there potential winnings are safe.

I see it as sort of an all or nothing circumstance. if one user wants a med ALL fg must go to the med.

I do think this is good as akinos points out it allows a proving grounds of sorts, my only issue is that we have a rule against it.

we shouldnt have a rule with special permissions based on undefined criteria as it just opens up room for accusations of bias and corruption.

Also i want to say thanks to akinos, haven't talked to you much even in my rare excursions out of hockey, but some solid / level headed contributions to the discussion.


this is kind of a slippery slope

what if some one has a problem with that med that gets sent the fg, does that med have to send to another med?

heres my take.... if you dont like it dont play.

i went to the casino this weekend and guess what there were tons of tables for me to chose from

poker? nope not unless it was a tourniquet, craps? nope i dont understand that shit, black jack? ahh yes! wait... i dont like this dealer, oh i know instead of throwing a fit ill go find another table
Member
Posts: 26,437
Joined: Jan 20 2013
Gold: 982.86
Dec 9 2015 06:23pm
Quote (KoJ @ Dec 9 2015 08:08pm)
i have run games in the past as active and always use dx, crispy or pens to be the medi

no issues.

i understand some people think this is a big deal and others dont, either way it dosent really matter as long as things are being handled with integrity and honesty. (which i feel is happening)





this is kind of a slippery slope

what if some one has a problem with that med that gets sent the fg, does that med have to send to another med?

heres my take.... if you dont like it dont play.

i went to the casino this weekend and guess what there were tons of tables for me to chose from

poker? nope not unless it was a tourniquet, craps? nope i dont understand that shit, black jack? ahh yes! wait... i dont like this dealer, oh i know instead of throwing a fit ill go find another table


Id say a med has a med tag for a reason and cant be rejected. Where as actives by the book shouldnt be allowed to host so if anyone has an objection it would need to be heeded (remember we are talking about the active holding the fg not using a med for that part)

Also i think people like you should be trusted
Member
Posts: 49,220
Joined: Oct 24 2003
Gold: 0.00
Dec 9 2015 06:25pm
woah

people like me?

racist
Member
Posts: 38,401
Joined: Feb 3 2006
Gold: 26.26
Dec 9 2015 06:26pm
Quote (KoJ @ Dec 9 2015 07:25pm)
woah

people like me?

racist


not me though

koj for welcher
Member
Posts: 37,239
Joined: Oct 13 2008
Gold: 3,375.01
Dec 9 2015 06:29pm
Quote (KoJ @ Dec 9 2015 05:25pm)
woah

people like me?

racist


i like you , you seem like a good person.

you probably go to the gym too much though.

This post was edited by dirTyMan on Dec 9 2015 06:29pm
Go Back To Hockey Topic List
Prev19596979899104Next
Closed New Topic New Poll