Quote (Decaliss3ur @ Nov 29 2010 02:55am)
Ah ok, like the habs, in 50s, 70s, and early 80s?
But seriously, saying brazil isn't a dynasty is kind of an insult.... they have bred the best players, who what if they haven't won the last 2 world cups? They have a legitimate shot at the next one with all their young players who in time will develop a playing a style. The age of the ronaldinho with the big dangerous moves is passed, the young guns just have to find their ways.... Andres, Robinhos, Coutinho..... All amazing players
But anyways that's soccer and it's very hard to define a dynasty considering all the different leagues. I guess Brazil being a dynasty is kind of debatable..... but not really since 5 golds, 2 silvers and 2 bronze is remarkable, considering the other teams.
Fuck Italy though
They are not a dynasty
right now. I think you're tangled up on the definition of the word. Straight from wikipedia:
Quote
A sports dynasty is a team that dominates their sport or league for multiple seasons or years.
Brazil isn't dominating international soccer right now so they aren't a dynasty at this moment; I'd say there isn't any right now. I'm arguing from a national team perspective, though, not players themselves.I'm Brazilian, BTW, so I'm not contesting that we yield the best players.
This post was edited by Cruzader on Nov 29 2010 04:06am