Quote (Killingyouall @ 22 Dec 2020 07:01)
Thinking Patrik Laine has a monster year because he wants that GG long term contract.
Also brutal that half the decrease list is Sharks lol.
Yeah he explains West conference won't have much scoring cuz the teams are defensively better.
Whereas Canadian teams all suck defensively, except Habs. While majority of the Canadian teams have good offence, so expect high scoring. Also feast on the Sens.
==
On the flip side, the West division has a complete murderer’s row of defensive stoppers plus high-end goaltending that will make scoring there extremely challenging. The Sharks are the only team expected to be terrible defensively with the Kings being only a little bit below average. The rest? Five of the eight teams project to be in the Top 10 for goals allowed with Anaheim not far behind either. All five of Anaheim, Arizona, Colorado, St. Louis and Vegas have very strong goaltending that can steal games on their own. Arizona’s goaltenders are routinely at the top of any goaltending category, then there’s John Gibson – one of the game’s best with the potential to bounce back – plus Jordan Binnington, Robin Lehner and even Philipp Grubauer. It’ll be tough, but even tougher is that Colorado, Minnesota, St. Louis and Vegas are all among the league’s stingiest teams too. Even getting to each team’s goalie will be a challenge.
In Canada, stars like Connor McDavid, Auston Matthews, and Elias Pettersson are going to have a field day with the collective defensive and goaltending talent in the division and that might mean a few more points than one might initially expect. It’s not worth shooting a player way up the rankings, but it’s enough to move them up a couple of spots, or be the key tie-breaker between two close talents. In the West, stars like Nathan MacKinnon, Mark Stone, and Ryan O’Reilly will have it much tougher and they might need to be moved down the board as a result of likely earning fewer points than expected.
Here’s a real world example. Say you’re picking fourth. McDavid, Leon Draisaitl and Nikita Kucherov are all off the board. Conventional wisdom says to pick MacKinnon, especially after his monstrous playoff run, but the decision between him and Matthews, the next best center, is closer than you might think, simply because of schedule strength.
Without any adjustment, I project MacKinnon to score 68 points in 56 games, while Matthews would be projected for 65 points in 56 games. Factoring in who MacKinnon plays against would drop him to 66 while Matthews would jump up to 68 himself. It’s the slightest shift for either player, but it ends up flipping both players where Matthews might be the more attractive fantasy option this year purely because of his schedule. Of course, there are other factors that make MacKinnon more attractive, like his durability, shot rate, and power play points, but the point is it becomes a discussion rather than a slam dunk. For perhaps a better example, MacKinnon is currently getting drafted before Draisaitl in Yahoo leagues and, given Draisaitl also plays for a Canadian team and has left-wing eligibility, he’s likely the stronger choice.
It’s possible that something like this might not apply to a superstar like MacKinnon, but it’s definitely worth considering on draft day. I don’t blame you if you believe in MacKinnon, he’s worthy of it, but if it comes down to Brock Boeser or Max Pacioretty, pick the guy with the easier schedule. It’s very likely going to matter this year, especially for the stronger offensive teams in Canada and the weaker defensive teams in the West. Stay away from San Jose altogether.
This post was edited by Secksii on Dec 22 2020 09:06am