really though the leafs were already in contact with him while he was under contract with the wings which is illegal i believe
i think thats why they added the compensation for exact situations like that

but when u fire a guy hes gone u dont get compensation thats retarded but if a team steals a top staff guy sure why not

This post was edited by dragoneth on Jun 22 2016 03:39pm

It's really quite bush-league for the NHL to botch this rule.

It should have been very simple:

If the person is still under contract and currently employed and decides to leave, you get compensated. If he's been "relieved of his duties" or is about to become a free-agent then there's no compensation.

you shouldn't get compensated when someone is being promoted to a better job

ASST GMs aren't going to sign year to year contracts and apply yearly

They're getting promoted, but to a different organization which hurts your organization directly because you lose a valued member and indirectly because now your competition gains a valued member.

Why shouldn't you be compensated if that person is still under contract with you?

keep them from being interviewed for job.

Orioles did it to Jays

If you leave your company to work for another, should they be compensated?

If you fire an employee and they go for work elsewhere. Should you be compensated despite it being your choice to let them go?

This post was edited by Farine on Jun 22 2016 04:30pm

Answer mine first pls

Your's hurts my head. I just wanted to be apart of the conversation.

Wot

You work at dominos
You leave dominos and work for pizza pizza
Should dominos be compensated.

If that's confusing idk