???????????

And how was it ruled? No clue what your point is

Me not liking the rule /=/ what the ruling should be



https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=165&v=kBriOtvkybk

This post was edited by ZxFamily-GuyxZ on Apr 19 2019 07:56pm

notice I said 10% and you brought up

show a call he lost that was this close

Headcontact fully in the crease before the puck goes in?

How is this relevant?

That one may be the worst goalie interference call ever
Don't say it goes against you guys lol

Either way, that's enough about bad officiating from me

We had 0 goals and that wasn't the refs fault. Need to play MUCH better.



GOOD LORD LOL

This post was edited by ZxFamily-GuyxZ on Apr 19 2019 07:59pm

the Kapanen goal was literally the same as Matthews'

Maybe Rask was just out of position for both goals

Rask wasn't going to make it over anyways. It was a great screen and the contact was basically negligible.

holy fuck you are some kind of retarded lmao

Lol does all caps help your point?

You are whinning about a bad goal that 2/3 leafs fans in this thread acknowledged was a bad goal and posting irrelevant video of noncomparable interference calls

but Hyman is outside the crease

why does goalie get benefit of the doubt?