d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > Sports Coliseum > Hockey > Official Rumor Thread > Trades/draft Day/ufas
Prev17357367377387391445Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 45,148
Joined: Mar 8 2008
Gold: 795.90
Jun 8 2016 07:49am
Quote (Genetics @ Jun 8 2016 09:41am)
Gotcha. That + would be a high pick or one of your top prospects then no? Assuming shattenkirk agrees to 're sign?


I'd be fine with tatar, a decent prospect like Pulkkinen, ouellet, sproul, and a 2017 1st or 2nd for Shattenkirk and say a 2018 3rd that becomes a 4th if he re-signs. Or something along those lines, I'm sure they'd tweak it.

Ouellet and Sproul could turn into great middle pair or PP specialist defensemen especially with the development system in STL, then Shatty's absence wouldn't hurt as much. Both seem NHL ready.

This post was edited by dxlightning on Jun 8 2016 07:50am
Member
Posts: 22,354
Joined: Jul 28 2007
Gold: 1,539.00
Jun 8 2016 07:55am
Quote (dxlightning @ Jun 8 2016 01:49pm)
I'd be fine with tatar, a decent prospect like Pulkkinen, ouellet, sproul, and a 2017 1st or 2nd for Shattenkirk and say a 2018 3rd that becomes a 4th if he re-signs. Or something along those lines, I'm sure they'd tweak it.

Ouellet and Sproul could turn into great middle pair or PP specialist defensemen especially with the development system in STL, then Shatty's absence wouldn't hurt as much. Both seem NHL ready.


id like to deal pulkkinen packed with someone
would def rather keep ouelett and sproul.
i want to see YOUNG D UP
i feel like either way we are in a shit show the only defense man we are really getting rid of is Quincy as of right now.
he isnt even the big part of the problem.

This post was edited by JamFtw on Jun 8 2016 08:00am
Member
Posts: 43,629
Joined: Jun 19 2009
Gold: 0.00
Jun 8 2016 07:59am
I can never tell when you guys are fantasizing or discussing real rumors... but shit what's a real rumor until it's clearly confirmed or denied.

Member
Posts: 45,148
Joined: Mar 8 2008
Gold: 795.90
Jun 8 2016 08:01am
Quote (zNick @ Jun 8 2016 09:59am)
I can never tell when you guys are fantasizing or discussing real rumors... but shit what's a real rumor until it's clearly confirmed or denied.


Usually unless it has a link, a twitter handle, or the word "report" it's just discussion and fantasizing.
Member
Posts: 43,629
Joined: Jun 19 2009
Gold: 0.00
Jun 8 2016 08:02am
Quote (dxlightning @ Jun 8 2016 09:01am)
Usually unless it has a link, a twitter handle, or the word "report" it's just discussion and fantasizing.


LoL true.. alright Im going to watch casino and pass out 10 min into it.

this report is def confirmed.
Member
Posts: 52,835
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 250.00
Jun 8 2016 08:46am
Quote (dxlightning @ Jun 8 2016 08:49am)
I'd be fine with tatar, a decent prospect like Pulkkinen, ouellet, sproul, and a 2017 1st or 2nd for Shattenkirk and say a 2018 3rd that becomes a 4th if he re-signs. Or something along those lines, I'm sure they'd tweak it.

Ouellet and Sproul could turn into great middle pair or PP specialist defensemen especially with the development system in STL, then Shatty's absence wouldn't hurt as much. Both seem NHL ready.


How far off base are we on svechnikov? If we drop the first, could he be in play?

Im speaking on behalf of Doug Armstrong ofc

This post was edited by Genetics on Jun 8 2016 08:47am
Member
Posts: 45,148
Joined: Mar 8 2008
Gold: 795.90
Jun 8 2016 08:50am
Quote (Genetics @ Jun 8 2016 10:46am)
How far off base are we on svechnikov? If we drop the first, could he be in play?

Im speaking on behalf of Doug Armstrong ofc


Hahaha I have no clue what Holland thinks of Svechnikov but I doubt he's in play. Kenny almost never deals decent prospects unless they want out like Jarnkrok or they're way too far down the depth chart like Janmark. Svechnikov has been playing really well.

Or maybe he just doesn't like players with a soft J.. interested in Jurco?

This post was edited by dxlightning on Jun 8 2016 08:50am
Member
Posts: 52,835
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 250.00
Jun 8 2016 09:53am
Quote (dxlightning @ Jun 8 2016 09:50am)
Hahaha I have no clue what Holland thinks of Svechnikov but I doubt he's in play. Kenny almost never deals decent prospects unless they want out like Jarnkrok or they're way too far down the depth chart like Janmark. Svechnikov has been playing really well.

Or maybe he just doesn't like players with a soft J.. interested in Jurco?


Yea that's another thing that seems confusing.

With next year being hitchs last, are we still gonna make moves for Hitchcock style guys, or what?

Would love a solid forward prospect over defense. We're so stacked defensively it's silly.


So wait, that's pronounced 'yurko' not 'jurko'?

This post was edited by Genetics on Jun 8 2016 09:54am
Member
Posts: 49,221
Joined: Oct 24 2003
Gold: 0.00
Jun 8 2016 10:52am
Quote (Genetics @ Jun 8 2016 08:53am)
So wait, that's pronounced 'yurko' not 'jurko'?


jes
Member
Posts: 45,148
Joined: Mar 8 2008
Gold: 795.90
Jun 8 2016 10:57am
Quote (Genetics @ Jun 8 2016 11:53am)
Yea that's another thing that seems confusing.

With next year being hitchs last, are we still gonna make moves for Hitchcock style guys, or what?

Would love a solid forward prospect over defense. We're so stacked defensively it's silly.


So wait, that's pronounced 'yurko' not 'jurko'?


Toe-mosh yurko
Go Back To Hockey Topic List
Prev17357367377387391445Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll