Quote (dirTyMan @ Jun 2 2017 11:47am)
Yes they absolutely are disadvantaged. Go look up studies on the hidden curriculum, dressing girls in dresses and having them play with dolls opposed to running around playing in the dirt is hindering womens physical ability. Plenty of scientific literature on the subject.
Social capital, language you use in class/in general, etc. All plays a role in how an individual will develop physically and mentally. Most people aren't aware of this, I'm lucky enough to be required to take a class based around curriculum, societal norms, the surveillance state (penopticon theory) . it's quite mind blowing how we are royally fucking up our children's development with things as simple as the language we use with them.
dude, its 2017
this argument might of held some weight if it was 1990... maybe early 2000's
(any of the sporty girls i know weren't anyways)
girls are no longer raised this way, but regardless,
someone mentioned a woman out performing a man on the shooting range, i think thats the only recorded sport victory a female has made over a man? i googled and thats all i could find. (something to do with their hips are better suited for the movement)
it doesn't matter, my point, again,
is men are bigger (true) faster (also true) and stronger (definitely true)
there is NO counter argument to my statement.
This post was edited by Tear on Jun 2 2017 02:03pm