Quote (dirTyMan @ Jun 2 2017 10:47am)
Yes they absolutely are disadvantaged. Go look up studies on the hidden curriculum, dressing girls in dresses and having them play with dolls opposed to running around playing in the dirt is hindering womens physical ability. Plenty of scientific literature on the subject.
Social capital, language you use in class/in general, etc. All plays a role in how an individual will develop physically and mentally. Most people aren't aware of this, I'm lucky enough to be required to take a class based around curriculum, societal norms, the surveillance state (penopticon theory) . it's quite mind blowing how we are royally fucking up our children's development with things as simple as the language we use with them.
Tear's argument is basically is basically that men are bigger and more muslcular and thus superior from what I see. There's a reason there are no women in football and hockey etc, those sport are about being strong. Women are better suited to different sports, like they wipe the floor with men at gymnastics, and nowadays stuff like marksmanship. The best snipers in WWII were Russian women, men couldn't compare on the eastern front, for example.
Tear do u vote for the candidate with the biggest triceps too, clearly better suited to lead imo