d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > Sports Coliseum > Hockey > Official Rumor Thread > Trades/draft Day/ufas
Prev17057067077087091445Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 39,227
Joined: Mar 1 2006
Gold: 12,140.00
May 1 2016 01:59pm
Quote (dragoneth @ May 1 2016 12:56pm)
trying to trade up to 1oa?


What... why?

Down if anything, or maybe just straight up for a current player.
Member
Posts: 99,164
Joined: Nov 13 2004
Gold: 7,865.01
May 1 2016 02:00pm
Quote (LuLer @ May 1 2016 02:59pm)
What... why?

Down if anything, or maybe just straight up for a current player.


cuz its edm they dont know how to draft if they dont have the 1st oa
they cant pick the concensus #1 overall so when its like 2-5 there like man idk who to pick

This post was edited by dragoneth on May 1 2016 02:00pm
Member
Posts: 45,148
Joined: Mar 8 2008
Gold: 795.90
May 1 2016 02:04pm
Quote (dragoneth @ May 1 2016 03:56pm)
trying to trade up to 1oa?


It was part of a larger tweet -

Darren DregerVerified account
‏@DarrenDreger
Toronto, Wpg, CBJ very unlikely to consider trading their top 3 draft picks. Edmonton's pick, 4th overall is definitely in play.

Edmonton has pieces with McDavid now that if they can get an established #1 D-man they might trade the pick that would get them a D-man they'd have to develop. At least that's what I'd think they'd be looking for.

This post was edited by dxlightning on May 1 2016 02:06pm
Member
Posts: 99,164
Joined: Nov 13 2004
Gold: 7,865.01
May 1 2016 02:16pm
Quote (dxlightning @ May 1 2016 03:04pm)
It was part of a larger tweet -

Darren DregerVerified account
‏@DarrenDreger
Toronto, Wpg, CBJ very unlikely to consider trading their top 3 draft picks. Edmonton's pick, 4th overall is definitely in play.

Edmonton has pieces with McDavid now that if they can get an established #1 D-man they might trade the pick that would get them a D-man they'd have to develop. At least that's what I'd think they'd be looking for.


yeah i was just trying to troll...way to ruin it :P
maybe hamonic for oilers 4th? didnt he want to go west to alberta team and is a pretty solid d man
isles dont have too trade him but he did ask for a pretty legit reason i mean at some point they should honor his request

This post was edited by dragoneth on May 1 2016 02:18pm
Member
Posts: 27,518
Joined: May 10 2009
Gold: 13,891.00
May 1 2016 02:53pm
I wouldnt trade that for (personally) unless I am getting an Ekblad in return.

Now I know that pick cant get an Ekblad but Id use the pick unless it was something substantial. Hamonic not substantial enough for me (for that pick).
Member
Posts: 99,164
Joined: Nov 13 2004
Gold: 7,865.01
May 1 2016 03:09pm
Quote (Stealth @ May 1 2016 03:53pm)
I wouldnt trade that for (personally) unless I am getting an Ekblad in return.

Now I know that pick cant get an Ekblad but Id use the pick unless it was something substantial. Hamonic not substantial enough for me (for that pick).


well i mean hamonic would be a decent base point maybe hamonic+2nd or another prospect
what team has a top d man they want to trade for a draft pick though?whos out there that might be an option?
hamonic? vatanen? who else? neither are really worth the pick imo

This post was edited by dragoneth on May 1 2016 03:10pm
Member
Posts: 27,518
Joined: May 10 2009
Gold: 13,891.00
May 1 2016 03:11pm
Quote (dragoneth @ May 1 2016 05:09pm)
well i mean hamonic would be a decent base point maybe hamonic+2nd or another prospect
what team has a top d man they want to trade for a draft pick though?whos out there that might be an option?
hamonic? vatanen? who else? neither are really worth the pick imo


I'd say they could be worth the pick but I personally would want something "more."

What I mean is Ekblad can change your franchise. Hamonic is good but he's not going to define a franchise.
I think the top 5 - top 10 players in this draft would be worth more in the long run
Member
Posts: 33,331
Joined: Mar 11 2008
Gold: 2,920.00
May 1 2016 03:14pm
would be a good pick for a team whos strong on D and feels they cant protect them all come expansion

trade for a pick which is protected.

I dunno. interesting summer this will be with expansion in mind.

Member
Posts: 99,164
Joined: Nov 13 2004
Gold: 7,865.01
May 1 2016 03:20pm
Quote (Stealth @ May 1 2016 04:11pm)
I'd say they could be worth the pick but I personally would want something "more."

What I mean is Ekblad can change your franchise. Hamonic is good but he's not going to define a franchise.
I think the top 5 - top 10 players in this draft would be worth more in the long run


i agree
but its at the point edm wants to win now and needs D
and thers not much for d in terms of early picks its pretty much all forwards which oilers dont need

this is prob one of the better years for them to try and trade the pick but idk about bringing in a franchise type d man
most teams prob offer thier 1st+ other picks/prospect or like hamonic+ its going to be hard to get what they want and what the picks worth

This post was edited by dragoneth on May 1 2016 03:22pm
Member
Posts: 39,227
Joined: Mar 1 2006
Gold: 12,140.00
May 1 2016 03:44pm
Yeah nobody is giving their #1 or maybe even #2 Dman for that 4th pick.

I think the Oilers should just trade down a few spots and then trade other pieces for guys like Hamonic and Brodin.
Go Back To Hockey Topic List
Prev17057067077087091445Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll