Bieksa is probably your least valuable defenseman next to Sbisa. I dont think there is a chance in hell you get Lucic straight up.

guys 27 and a "possible" starting goalie you really think they can get more?

27 is the prime of a goalie.

I think a 1st is fair.. 2 high 2nds also

cbj gave flyers a 2nd +4th or some shit for bob and he won a vezina
then flyers traded a 3rd+some garbage for mason
and the rangers want more then 2 2nds for a 27 year old that can potentially be a starter?
with the goalei market the way it is if anybody pays that they are fuckin nuts and should be fired as gm

dont get me wrong talbot is good but the guy is 27 even if thats the "prime" how long does a goalies prime last into the 30s? usually not very long unless the goalie is elite

This post was edited by dragoneth on Jun 23 2015 05:05pm

No chance.

Lucic's trade value is a lot higher than he's actually worth.

Would probably take a 1st + one of our better prospects (not Jenbust).

I know it probably wouldn't happen. I'd be really disappointed if we gave futures for Lucic. I'd be okay with giving some of our oldies though.

ya.. maybe he has a current offer better than 2 2nds

or maybe hes just greedy and they end up not tradin him for anything or getting less

maybe

I'm sure they are still happy having him as a back up though

This post was edited by h4bs on Jun 23 2015 05:46pm

mason and bobrovsky had 3+ GAA's before they were traded. going to need some better examples.