d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > Sports Coliseum > Hockey > Official Off-topic Off-hockey Thread > Ofc
Prev1483548364837483848395001Next
Closed New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 42,679
Joined: Jul 8 2008
Gold: 8,000.00
Jun 18 2016 04:21pm
Quote (Caedus @ Jun 18 2016 06:16pm)
Well sometimes they use much smaller polls, 1000-1500 people to apply to national results. Some polling is very flawed, but it's not flawed in the way they select people. For the most part if the polling company is anything remotely capable (and most are, they make all their money on private contracts not political polling) their sample is very close to representative. Where political polls falter is they ask the wrong questions, or simply it's impossible to get a truly random sample because people don't really want to answer those questions so they can't be as picky as who they ask.


my link shows that Ontario is semi conservative province, but you completely ignore it

This post was edited by KrWWW on Jun 18 2016 04:22pm
Member
Posts: 45,148
Joined: Mar 8 2008
Gold: 795.90
Jun 18 2016 04:24pm
Quote (Caedus @ Jun 18 2016 06:16pm)
Well sometimes they use much smaller polls, 1000-1500 people to apply to national results. Some polling is very flawed, but it's not flawed in the way they select people. For the most part if the polling company is anything remotely capable (and most are, they make all their money on private contracts not political polling) their sample is very close to representative. Where political polls falter is they ask the wrong questions, or simply it's impossible to get a truly random sample because people don't really want to answer those questions so they can't be as picky as who they ask.


Again, that's the industry assumption, but I have reservations against using it for politics - the industry of stats tends to use sample size as a be all end all, the same sample size equation applies to every industry. I don't buy it.

Most industries are 5-10 years behind on stats when it comes to sampling.

This post was edited by dxlightning on Jun 18 2016 04:25pm
Member
Posts: 48,261
Joined: Aug 1 2008
Gold: 1,819.09
Jun 18 2016 04:38pm
Quote (KrWWW @ Jun 18 2016 06:21pm)
my link shows that Ontario is semi conservative province, but you completely ignore it


Were you meaning to quote me? Considering I'd actually agree that Ontario is semi-conservative, I'm not sure lol .

Quote (dxlightning @ Jun 18 2016 06:24pm)
Again, that's the industry assumption, but I have reservations against using it for politics - the industry of stats tends to use sample size as a be all end all, the same sample size equation applies to every industry. I don't buy it.

Most industries are 5-10 years behind on stats when it comes to sampling.


I think the perfectly random sample is the end all be all, only problem is actually achieving that. Yes the equation does change in most industries, but an underlying principle remains. I'm usually skeptical of quantitative evidence, as you said it's often taken to be a tool that's viewed as far more perfect than it actually is, but the (theoretical) math behind sample sizes and the normal curve has me convinced, mostly, that sufficient sample sizes properly surveyed are generally sound.

I do agree that polling is deficient in politics. Polling has never interested me that much mostly because I find it to be an inaccurate tool of making specific analytical judgements. It's OK for making generalizations and big picture observations, but it's not good at telling us how people actually think.
Member
Posts: 45,148
Joined: Mar 8 2008
Gold: 795.90
Jun 18 2016 04:48pm
Quote (Caedus @ Jun 18 2016 06:38pm)
Were you meaning to quote me? Considering I'd actually agree that Ontario is semi-conservative, I'm not sure lol .



I think the perfectly random sample is the end all be all, only problem is actually achieving that. Yes the equation does change in most industries, but an underlying principle remains. I'm usually skeptical of quantitative evidence, as you said it's often taken to be a tool that's viewed as far more perfect than it actually is, but the (theoretical) math behind sample sizes and the normal curve has me convinced, mostly, that sufficient sample sizes properly surveyed are generally sound.

I do agree that polling is deficient in politics. Polling has never interested me that much mostly because I find it to be an inaccurate tool of making specific analytical judgements. It's OK for making generalizations and big picture observations, but it's not good at telling us how people actually think.

Agreed that perfect randomness is the be all end all. I just don't think anyone achieves it. No public political poll takes into account which sectors vote more often than others. No polls go further than district-level. No poll even bothers to check if anyone gives a shit about the election.

There might be value there but by no means does it have much bearing on the current administration.
Member
Posts: 48,261
Joined: Aug 1 2008
Gold: 1,819.09
Jun 18 2016 04:50pm
Quote (dxlightning @ Jun 18 2016 06:48pm)
Agreed that perfect randomness is the be all end all. I just don't think anyone achieves it. No public political poll takes into account which sectors vote more often than others. No polls go further than district-level. No poll even bothers to check if anyone gives a shit about the election.

There might be value there but by no means does it have much bearing on the current administration.


True, and that's really the futility is political polling.
Member
Posts: 45,148
Joined: Mar 8 2008
Gold: 795.90
Jun 19 2016 02:18pm
New season of Orange is the new Black is :O
I don't know what Netflix is doing differently from other networks but the quality of writing is as good as or better than the beginning.

This post was edited by dxlightning on Jun 19 2016 02:18pm
Member
Posts: 53,782
Joined: Aug 7 2008
Gold: 2,950.01
Jun 19 2016 03:17pm
Quote (dxlightning @ Jun 19 2016 03:18pm)
New season of Orange is the new Black is :O
I don't know what Netflix is doing differently from other networks but the quality of writing is as good as or better than the beginning.


i stopped watching after like halfway through season 2

what season are they at now maybe i'll pick it up again
Member
Posts: 42,679
Joined: Jul 8 2008
Gold: 8,000.00
Jun 19 2016 03:31pm
Member
Posts: 53,782
Joined: Aug 7 2008
Gold: 2,950.01
Jun 19 2016 03:46pm
Quote (KrWWW @ Jun 19 2016 04:31pm)


Jesus

Member
Posts: 42,312
Joined: Nov 7 2007
Gold: 0.00
Jun 19 2016 03:52pm
Quote (zNick @ 18 Jun 2016 15:57)


Dayum, we get stats like that every other month in a few cities around here lol.
Go Back To Hockey Topic List
Prev1483548364837483848395001Next
Closed New Topic New Poll