d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > Sports Coliseum > Hockey > Official Transactions Thread > Signings/trades/call Ups/etc
Prev14794804814824832487Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 62,390
Joined: Dec 11 2007
Gold: 0.00
Sep 10 2013 12:15pm
Quote (dxlightning @ Sep 10 2013 01:49pm)
Just saying when you think about it the team changes every year. One team's history is essentially the story of hundreds of different teams as key players and management change in and out. You can chunk it into periods of time but even 5 years makes a huge difference.

Because of that churn there is no apples to apples comparison and there's no way to definitively say which team is better.


I agree 100%. Dej and some Flyers fans can think that they are the most successful non o6 team all they like, but you're right in that there's no right answer here - only opinions. Mine is simply that the team with the most Stanley cups aka best team in the league when it counts has the more solid history. Teams can't make it to and win the final if they weren't successful in the regular and post season. You could also weigh in the number of years they've been around as a team or franchise and the strength and quantity of other teams they faced. I'm not saying regular and post season success is 100% negligible, but It's really marginable compared to winning the cup IN MY OPINION. Also adding defunct teams' stats to the more successful ones and comparing them to teams that haven't been relocated is just ridiculous. One of the main reasons a team is currently defunct is because they weren't successful which is directly linked to bringing in money for said team. Like I said earlier, I'm fine with agreeing to disagree here. Dej is known to be stubborn and stick by his opinions for a reason.
Member
Posts: 23,407
Joined: Jul 15 2004
Gold: 206.00
Sep 10 2013 12:17pm
In last 20 years. NJ Devils has been the best expansion team
Member
Posts: 99,164
Joined: Nov 13 2004
Gold: 7,865.01
Sep 10 2013 12:36pm
Quote (Subban @ Sep 10 2013 02:03pm)
Man up


man up?huh?
did u confirm? if so c'd
who u want to med?

This post was edited by dragoneth on Sep 10 2013 12:36pm
Member
Posts: 49,221
Joined: Oct 24 2003
Gold: 0.00
Sep 10 2013 12:38pm
Quote (rattle-trap @ Sep 10 2013 11:17am)
In last 20 years. NJ Devils has been the brokest expansion team


fixedish
Member
Posts: 23,407
Joined: Jul 15 2004
Gold: 206.00
Sep 10 2013 12:39pm
Quote (KoJ @ Sep 10 2013 06:38pm)
fixedish


Still won 3 cups and 5 sc final appearances in past 20 years.
Member
Posts: 34,590
Joined: Feb 22 2011
Gold: 1,363.36
Sep 10 2013 12:40pm
Quote (dragoneth @ Sep 10 2013 02:36pm)
man up?huh?
did u confirm? if so c'd
who u want to med?


You can bet against yourself, I don't give a flying fuck
Member
Posts: 37,239
Joined: Oct 13 2008
Gold: 3,375.01
Sep 10 2013 12:51pm
Arguing over things that don't matter.


Everyone knows the Ducks are the greatest franchise in the history of sports.
Member
Posts: 78,286
Joined: Jun 22 2005
Gold: 30.10
Sep 10 2013 12:54pm
Quote (Rivals @ Sep 10 2013 07:15pm)
I agree 100%. Dej and some Flyers fans can think that they are the most successful non o6 team all they like, but you're right in that there's no right answer here - only opinions. Mine is simply that the team with the most Stanley cups aka best team in the league when it counts has the more solid history. Teams can't make it to and win the final if they weren't successful in the regular and post season. You could also weigh in the number of years they've been around as a team or franchise and the strength and quantity of other teams they faced. I'm not saying regular and post season success is 100% negligible, but It's really marginable compared to winning the cup IN MY OPINION. Also adding defunct teams' stats to the more successful ones and comparing them to teams that haven't been relocated is just ridiculous. One of the main reasons a team is currently defunct is because they weren't successful which is directly linked to bringing in money for said team. Like I said earlier, I'm fine with agreeing to disagree here. Dej is known to be stubborn and stick by his opinions for a reason.


i dont understand. at these stats, no relocated team got the edge over another? the team relocated and kept the team from prior to moving, thats a BIG difference from an expansion team. whats so hard to understand about it? i understand that you're mad that devils won't shine here, but these are facts.

i showed you stats that backed up my argument, and all you did was saying 1 cup > everything else, which is just ridicilous. i showed you #s that are taken from 67 to 2012 or whenever these stats are from.

we all know that you're a VERY big devils homer and you're probably disagreeing with me and saying "BUT RELOCATED TEAMS ARE NEW TEAMS" because devils is a relocated team who turned it around but is still the same old franchise as the rockies or whatever it is. you should have pride in your history rather than thinking its non-existant

i showed you the avs of '96, it was almost the '95 nordiques team. if avs was an expansion team they would have been completely irrelevant
Member
Posts: 78,286
Joined: Jun 22 2005
Gold: 30.10
Sep 10 2013 12:57pm
@andystrickland 46m
Brad Boyes will attend Florida #Panthers camp on a tryout...played last season with #Islanders
Member
Posts: 99,164
Joined: Nov 13 2004
Gold: 7,865.01
Sep 10 2013 12:58pm
Quote (Subban @ Sep 10 2013 02:40pm)
You can bet against yourself, I don't give a flying fuck


:rofl:
Go Back To Hockey Topic List
Prev14794804814824832487Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll