also these.


I think limiting meds is fine, but trusted should be uncapped.

I could understand however going for an odd number so there isnt a deadlock.

i think the nomination process is usually ok, enough get nominated regardless of the criteria

but weve had the discussion with the meds a few times and some people just flat out have a different opinion, and its not likely something we ever end up agreeing on, its just 2 different philosophies, but in the end each vote comes down to the meds personal preference, we have meds on each side of the coin so its gets evened out, if more meds get added it might change but who knows

the vote required isnt just 50/50, it has to be a higher than 50% yes in order to pass
currently we went with 6/9, that was something agreed upon by all meds

Not sure if it's sarcasm, but the guy can barely form a coherent sentence. I'm not sure if I want him making big decisions.

@Nearin, from what I see you don't tend to hold grudges, and even when I'm being a total dick you can be civil with me in a different discussions right after I said something retarded.

That's a good quality to have in someone who will have to deal with a lot of shit disturbers.

I am active because I have been posting and betting here for 5+ years, not because I follow the posts of some loser dweeb attention seeking baby face mamma titty sucking douche bag. I don't really even know who the fuck pcgaming is because I ignore every post from stupid people. I suggest if you want to actually get famous to try your act with you tube or twitch because apparently people have a thing for listening to fuck tards.

/thread (Nobody cares this is a sub forum for hockey chat on a diablo gaming forum)

i can hold grudges, but people don't seem to realize that my decisions as med still reflect the forum, case in point the fact that i vote both nauki and d2 god yes when its quite clear i don't get along with either of them

i trust drago with my firstborn

If you want more meds vote for them. The users that were left off the list for actives have enough reason and history with them to sway more than 50% of the trusted community to vote no.

Also we said this was mainly an operational update that trusted/mediators will be addressed next time. Can nobody read?

jbell and dd both told me to ask reasons via pm. pmed both. no answer at all. who should i pm next?

try not to, and in my experience the people who i butt heads with here are the same way outside of our arguments.
we are constantly going at each other in off topics but hockey talk is usually civil and you never get upset if im asking you something in game on rs

I remember my mind being blown when I was playing d3 and pc was giving me free runs just cuz. and was actually cool in game, same for sub.

The reality is most of us can be dickheads but none are complete dickheads.

I trust drago, but i feel like he is more emotionally guided than you might want in a trusted/med.

He would never welch some one who he disagreed with but i could see him failing to be impartial in a vote. ( no offense drago)