Quote (MeatStick101 @ Aug 10 2012 10:24am)
Sorry meant helped gets GwG.
Stone is slow as well, but has more scoring upside than Latendresse, and tbh playing with Spezza you don't have to be too fast. Look what Heatley did lol
Anyways idc, as long as we win games. I just wouldn't mind giving Stone his 9 games to see how he does
Of course he have more upside than Latendrese, he's only 20 years old

Stone has more upside than players like Smith, Neil, Greening, ect.. it doesn't means he should be in the lineup over them. Worst thing we can do with a prospect is to rush them to the NHL if their not ready.
Quote (IrishJoe @ Aug 10 2012 02:26pm)
this m akes sense, except i'd swap Greening and Latendresse... and Regin? wtf? hes made of glass brooo
Like I said, it's to start the year. Regin when not injured is easily capable of player in a top 9 role with the Sens, and maybe even top 6 for some games.
As for Greening vs Latendresse I think they are in a similar position. Both fringe top 6 players looking to prove themself. I think Latendresse will get a better chance to succeed than Greening because he is new to the organization and they know what to expect from Greening, but not from Latendresse. I think if both are on their A game, Latendresse is a much better player than Greening. Let's not forget he had 25 goals in 55 games for the Wild in 2009. If he finds chemistry with Spezza and doesn't get injured he could very well get even more. I've never been a fan of Greening in the top 6 tbh, very little hockey sense and he's much better suited to play in a bottom 6 role imo. I'd love to see a Greening - Smith - Neil eventually.