gz, selänne did 70 goal and 130pts in 80 game.

This post was edited by do_NaUKI on Dec 30 2016 12:30am

So did mogilny , in 7 less games (its 76 in 84 gp btw) if you wanna try compare apples to apples. If not try compare selanne numbers to 160 points in 60 games.
4 years of shitty Finnish pro is still 4 years of pro.

yup, some russian kid who isnt even famous got as many goals as mcdavid pts in 80 game. almost.
proves players were better 20 year ago.

and do not try "no thx, there were more goals" stuff plx, cus hasek had better goals per game in 90- than price have now lol.

Big diference in those years.

92-93 there was 14 players who had 50+ goals. 20 who had 100 points or more.

All but one of Hasek dominant years where after the 94-95 lockout, which saw us enter the 'dead puck era'.

There was some years where not even one player could crack 50 goals. Overall scoring was way down.

That and Hasek was a damn freak in his prime + he had a solid defensive team in front of him. Not a fair comparison at all.

This post was edited by Killingyouall on Dec 30 2016 01:20am

Mogilny was the same age in the same year and put up better numbers. Their career numbers actually track each other fairly well since you made me look it up. Denying that year was an statistical anomaly even considering the much higher scoring wide open pre-lemaire NHL is just idiotic.

Why teemu peak at age 23 if not statistical anomaly?
Also teemu owes most of fame to NHL Disney franchise marketing and super kariya.
He was good , certainly no Orr / Lemieux / Gretzky nor even a Bossy / yzerman / Forsberg / Jagr / Crosby / *soon to be added to list Connor .

Mogilny isn't some Russian kid you pleb

Learn some hockey

Just tied Crosby for first in pts. Hahahaha

Crosby played what, 10 less games?

Hahahahahahahah

Rekt