Hamhuis, Edler, Ehrhoff, Salo, Ballard and Bieksa. Detroit does not match that d core, overall. Samuellson and Torres draw back in after misssing the first 2 games but the Canucks are still up 2-0 anyways. NB depth eh?

Do you remember the run for stanley cup finals '82? your canucks are very pretty... or the canucks '98 regular season?

you're just hating because it's so easy to bw the best team

the point about me being irrelevent is because you're such a huge homer anything except canucks are irrelevent to hockey in general?

Kronwall and Stuart are better than anyone on Vancouver.

And they are Detroit's 3rd and 4th...

Wings have healthy scratched a instant Hall of Famer.

Wings aren't even playing with Zetterberg who is better than anyone on the Canucks.

lol

I vaguely remember the 81-82 run as I was quite young but that is when I fisrt got "into" hockey, yes. 93-94 where they missed winning the Cup by 1 goal is much fresher in my mind.

I'm by no means an expert on all 32 teams but I follow hockey in general and can get into conversations about many things that don't include the Canucks. Am I wrong sometimes? Ofcourse, I choose not to google my facts and try to go by memory as best as possible. I also have no problem admitting when I'm wrong.

wat

30*

jesus christ
canucks are good
detroit is good
stop fighting

Edler/Hamhuis/Ehrhoff are better and it aint even CLOSE. TY for the LOLZ though.

Wings have scratched a guy that should of retired at the end of last year, big whoop.

Sedins won b2b scoring titles but keep telling me how much better every single Wing is better than every single Canuck, it's humorous.

Well... I guess that's why they play the games, Huh nibbler?