Quote (Nearin @ May 13 2015 04:49pm)
I think you can also just say no, if they can they will find another juror.
I got one and just said i cant im in school, studying exams no time to go to the ciry yadayadaya never heard anything back.
They're supposed to say tough luck it's your civic duty. There is exemptions though.
Quote (dxlightning @ May 13 2015 04:46pm)
In the US, lawyers are only able to throw out a certain number of jurors. It is supposed to be representative of your peers after all, even the racist and bigoted people
First and foremost a jury should be unbiased. What you're referring to is a sort of veto both the prosecution and defense (or plaintiff and defendant) have. I'm sure you know how it works already but for others jury selection works by going through the "pool" of jurors and asking them simple questions. Lawyers say if they're OK or not with the person, and can veto certain people they think will lean towards one side. The presiding judge of course has unlimited authority to control who is selected or not.
It's a jury of your peers, but it's supposed to be an unbiased jury of your peers. In the segregation south, juries were juries of your peers but they were incredibly biased. Modern justice system ought to avoid that and the jury selection process does its best to do that.