So one hand you're telling me to believe what's being reported. Then on the other you're saying I shouldn't believe what's being reported. Then you talk about following logic.
The mental gymnastics here is incredible

No, im telling you to actually rely on facts and data instead of relying on hearsays.

There is no report that exists that FDA denied Astra because they haven't even applied yet so it's not even possible. Literally only YOU stated that FDA has denied Astra vaccine. 630 ched morning talk show isn't bombarded with fake news articles for stating FDA denied it either, so you clearly came to your own conclusion from the confusion as i mentioned earlier.

It's really not hard to understand, i can't even believe i have to type this out to explain. jesus

This post was edited by Secksii on Mar 23 2021 04:44pm

Well he gets his news from alt-right garbage blogs and then regurgitates it as fact

Try again. 630 ched is as left as it gets

Came to my own conclusion? I verbatim said what they said on the show hahaa. Jesus you guys.

Just listened to the audio vault again. And yes. They said exactly what I mentioned. They fudged or brought incorrect info about their vaccine. And needs to be scrutinized harder. And, dont have fda approval.

where in the show did they report that FDA has denied Astra vaccine??? I'm literally telling you that it's not possible because they need to apply first to be even denied. You can't be this dense...

Yes, you came to your own conclusion because there is absolutely no information about Astra being denied by the FDA anywhere else because it's not possible as they haven't even applied for it yet.

They're still in their last stages of their phase 3 trials. Only you're claiming that they were denied, based on what you heard from a radio station and they didn't even report that Astra was denied by the FDA.

I can be just as clueless, confused and tell my friends/family that someone on jsp reported that FDA denied astra today as if it's a reliable source and not my own conclusion to follow hearsays as if it's fact.







are you sure they weren't talking about including the February data in their current trial in March, and that needs to be adjusted and they should follow fauci's advice to take that info out before applying to the FDA?
like the link i provided earlier that i think you were confused with? https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-03-23/astra-may-have-given-outdated-details-on-vaccine-says-u-s-body

This post was edited by Secksii on Mar 23 2021 05:42pm

Go listen to audio vault at 18mins. They said "so now it does not have fda approval"

March 23 6am show @ 18 mins in. I guess me making it sound like they "lost" it Implies they had it before which they didn't. But literally everything else I said was correct. Lol you guys are funny jumping over everything I say


What I find real amusing is you're more concerned with me saying the term lost then you are with them fudging numbers or health Canada labeling a side affect of astrazeneca being blood clots.

This post was edited by Subzer0isGG on Mar 23 2021 05:43pm

So are you bragging about how stupid your local news crew are, or how easily you swallowed it all up

Your new truck? Call another dealer lol they have loaner

If none want text me your vin and i can call for you to one of the gm dealership i make business with

This post was edited by Subban2 on Mar 23 2021 06:36pm