Nope

how so?

should we accept all older "dynasties" by the same rules?

so apparently

6th oa + shinkaruk + roster player for 1oa (reported by friedman)

@@

nn

The roster player is probably hansen

yeah, if it was tanev/garrison, might have done it

im not sold on shinkaruk anyway

Yeah shinkaruk never struck me as a guy who will be an impact nhler. Even garrison I wouldn't do it would have to be tanev

Shinkaruk was an absolute steal at 24th overall. Canucks should hold onto him with both hands.

meh, garrison was very good for florida, signed decently cheap

i dont care much for tanev, seem to have been bad when he didnt play with bieska (or was it hamhuis?)

Rules are remade in the game all the time, why is this different?

should we prorate all stats and records into todays stats?